How to promote cooperative innovation in environmentally friendly technology: a case of agricultural biotechnology in China

This study explored the factors influencing cooperative innovation in environmentally friendly agricultural biotechnology in China. First, we constructed an evolutionary game model comprising the factors of net income of cooperative innovation, net income of independent innovation, market constraint...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChinese journal of population resources and environment (Online) Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 127 - 135
Main Authors Ma, Hongkun, Mi, Xian, Zheng, Yi, Lv, Ning, Zhang, Shan, Hu, Chunting, Wu, Xiaowei, Cao, Yuan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ji'nan Elsevier B.V 01.06.2024
中国可持续发展研究会等
KeAi Publishing Communications Ltd
KeAi Communications Co., Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study explored the factors influencing cooperative innovation in environmentally friendly agricultural biotechnology in China. First, we constructed an evolutionary game model comprising the factors of net income of cooperative innovation, net income of independent innovation, market constraints, and government subsidies. Using MATLAB simulation, we assigned different values to the aforementioned variables to explore the evolutionary trend of innovators’ willingness to cooperate. Results showed that when the values of net income of cooperative innovation, net income of independent innovation, market constraints, and government subsidies exceeded the threshold, innovators’ willingness to cooperate was significantly enhanced. Furthermore, the proportion of innovators who cooperated with others gradually increased to 100%; otherwise, it gradually decreased to 0%. Comparing the simulation curve with the real evolution curve of cooperative innovation in agricultural biotechnology in China, we found that the gradual decline in the willingness to cooperate could be due to insufficient subsidies for cooperative innovation, low income from cooperative innovation, weak profitability of innovators, and weak market constraints.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2325-4262
2096-9589
2325-4262
DOI:10.1016/j.cjpre.2024.06.003