Switching sides—Reengineered primary charge separation in the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center
We report 90% yield of electron transfer (ET) from the singlet excited state P* of the primary electron-donor P (a bacteriochlorophyll dimer) to the B-side bacteriopheophytin (HB) in the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center (RC). Starting from a platform Rhodobacter sphaeroides RC bearing severa...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 117; no. 2; pp. 865 - 871 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
14.01.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We report 90% yield of electron transfer (ET) from the singlet excited state P* of the primary electron-donor P (a bacteriochlorophyll dimer) to the B-side bacteriopheophytin (HB) in the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center (RC). Starting from a platform Rhodobacter sphaeroides RC bearing several amino acid changes, an Arg in place of the native Leu at L185—positioned over one face of HB and only ∼4 Å from the 4 central nitrogens of the HB macrocycle—is the key additional mutation providing 90% yield of P⁺HB⁻. This all but matches the near-unity yield of A-side P⁺HA⁻ charge separation in the native RC. The 90% yield of ET to HB derives from (minimally) 3 P* populations with distinct means of P* decay. In an ∼40% population, P* decays in ∼4 ps via a 2-step process involving a short-lived P⁺BB⁻ intermediate, analogous to initial charge separation on the A side of wild-type RCs. In an ∼50% population, P* → P⁺HB⁻ conversion takes place in ∼20 ps by a superexchange mechanism mediated by BB. An ∼10% population of P* decays in ∼150 ps largely by internal conversion. These results address the long-standing dichotomy of Aversus B-side initial charge separation in native RCs and have implications for the mechanism(s) and timescale of initial ET that are required to achieve a near-quantitative yield of unidirectional charge separation. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 AC02-06CH11357; SC0002036 USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES) Edited by Donald R. Ort, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL, and approved December 4, 2019 (received for review September 16, 2019) Author contributions: P.D.L., D.K.H., D.H., and C.K. designed research; D.K.H., J.C.B., G.A.T., K.M.F., and C.K. performed research; J.C.B., K.M.F, D.H., and C.K. analyzed data; and D.H. and C.K. wrote the paper. |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1916119117 |