Quality Control of Involved Field Radiotherapy in Patients With Early-Favorable (HD10) and Early-Unfavorable (HD11) Hodgkin's Lymphoma: An Analysis of the German Hodgkin Study Group

• Published in: International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics Vol. 71; no. 5; pp. 1419 - 1424
• Main Authors: Eich, Hans Theodor, M.D, Engenhart-Cabillic, Rita, M.D, Hansemann, Katja, M.D, Lukas, Peter, M.D, Schneeweiss, Angelika, M.D, Seegenschmiedt, Heinrich, M.D, Skripnitchenko, Roman, M.D, Staar, Susanne, M.D, Willich, Normann, M.D, Müller, Rolf-Peter, M.D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.08.2008
• Subjects: Germany; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine; Hodgkin Disease - pathology; Hodgkin Disease - radiotherapy; Hodgkin's lymphoma; Humans; Involved-field radiotherapy; IRRADIATION; LYMPHOMAS; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; PATIENTS; Program Evaluation; QUALITY ASSURANCE; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIATION DOSES; Radiation Oncology - standards; Radiology; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOTHERAPY; Radiotherapy Dosage - standards; Retrospective Studies; Germany; Involved-field radiotherapy; Quality control; Hodgkin's lymphoma
• ISSN: 0360-3016; 1879-355X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.12.002

Purpose The German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) set up a radiotherapy (RT) reference center within the Department of Radiation Oncology at the University of Cologne to undertake quality assurance of the group's clinical studies. In the HD10 trial (early-favorable stages) and HD11 trial (early-unfavorable stages) all patients received involved field (IF)-RT (30 Gy vs. 20 Gy) within a combined-modality approach. For these patients a central prospective review of all diagnostic imaging was performed by expert radiation oncologists to control disease extension and to define IF treatment volume. Methods and Materials On the basis of simulation films, verification films, and radiotherapy case report form (CRF) an expert panel evaluated retrospectively the adequacy of irradiated IF treatment portals according to the RT prescription, applied radiation doses, treatment time, and technical parameters. Results Between 1999 and 2006 a total of 825 of 1370 randomized patients of the HD10 trial (60%) and 954 of 1422 patients of the HD11 trial (67%) were evaluated by the panel. Radiotherapy was rated as suboptimal in 47% of all reviewed cases. Although the participating RT centers received a precise RT prescription, most difficulties occurred in the adequate coverage of the IF (40%), followed by technical faults (12%). Deviations from the prescribed single daily dose (1.8–2 Gy), weekly dose, and total reference dose were rare (1%). Conclusions As a consequence of these findings, radiation oncologists were trained on the definition of IF-RT at GHSG meetings and at the annual meetings of the German Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology. Possible correlations between RT quality and relapse rate will be investigated.