Swedish Efforts to Contain Antibiotic Resistance in the Environment-A Qualitative Study among Selected Stakeholders

• Published in: Antibiotics (Basel) Vol. 11; no. 5; p. 646
• Main Authors: Björkman, Ingeborg, Röing, Marta, Eriksen, Jaran, Stålsby Lundborg, Cecilia
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 12.05.2022; MDPI
• Subjects: Animal health; Antibiotic resistance; Antibiotics; Codes; Content analysis; Data collection; Drug resistance; Government agencies; Interviews; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; National plans; One Health; Pharmaceutical industry; Qualitative research; qualitative study; Resistance factors; strategic action plan on antibiotic resistance; Swedish stakeholder perceptions; Sweden; qualitative study; strategic action plan on antibiotic resistance; Swedish stakeholder perceptions; One Health
• ISSN: 2079-6382; 2079-6382
• DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11050646

Antibiotic resistance is a serious global threat to human and animal health. In this study, we explored perceptions of work to contain antibiotic resistance with a focus on the environment. Nine stakeholders from six different areas were interviewed in 2018. A short information update was given by informants from four of the areas in 2021. Interview transcripts were analyzed by conventional content analysis. The stakeholders' perceptions were concluded in three categories: "examples of actions taken to combat antibiotic resistance", "factors influencing work", and "factors hindering work". All informants reported having a role to play. Some of them were very engaged in this issue, whereas among others, antibiotics and resistance were just one part of a general engagement. To be able to act, the policymaker stakeholders asked for more knowledge about antibiotics in the environment and possible actions to take. Actions from the government were requested by several informants. Coordination of the work to combat antibiotic resistance in the environment was not recognized and the One Health approach was known at policy level but not among practitioners. Still, actions seemed to be coordinated, but this was, according to the stakeholders, based on findings from research in their area rather than on strategies developed by national authorities.