Punishment diminishes the benefits of network reciprocity in social dilemma experiments

Network reciprocity has been widely advertised in theoretical studies as one of the basic cooperation-promoting mechanisms, but experimental evidence favoring this type of reciprocity was published only recently. When organized in an unchanging network of social contacts, human subjects cooperate pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 115; no. 1; pp. 30 - 35
Main Authors Li, Xuelong, Jusup, Marko, Wang, Zhen, Li, Huijia, Shi, Lei, Podobnik, Boris, Stanley, H. Eugene, Havlin, Shlomo, Boccaletti, Stefano
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 02.01.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Network reciprocity has been widely advertised in theoretical studies as one of the basic cooperation-promoting mechanisms, but experimental evidence favoring this type of reciprocity was published only recently. When organized in an unchanging network of social contacts, human subjects cooperate provided the following strict condition is satisfied: The benefit of cooperation must outweigh the total cost of cooperating with all neighbors. In an attempt to relax this condition, we perform social dilemma experiments wherein network reciprocity is aided with another theoretically hypothesized cooperation-promoting mechanism—costly punishment. The results reveal how networks promote and stabilize cooperation. This stabilizing effect is stronger in a smaller-size neighborhood, as expected from theory and experiments. Contrary to expectations, punishment diminishes the benefits of network reciprocity by lowering assortment, payoff per round, and award for cooperative behavior. This diminishing effect is stronger in a larger-size neighborhood. An immediate implication is that the psychological effects of enduring punishment override the rational response anticipated in quantitative models of cooperation in networks.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA)
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
Network Cyber Security (NECST)
National Science Foundation (NSF)
Chinese Young 1000 Talents Plan
AC07-05ID14517; PHY-1505000; CMMI-1125290; CHE-1213217; HDTRA1-14-1-0017
Japan Science Foundation
Inamori Foundation
US Department of the Navy, Office of Naval Research (ONR)
Croatian Science Foundation (HRZZ)
Israel Science Foundation (ISF)
Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS)
United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF)
Contributed by H. Eugene Stanley, November 14, 2017 (sent for review May 8, 2017; reviewed by Alison P. Galvani and Vito Latora)
1X.L., M.J., and Z.W. contributed equally to this work.
Author contributions: X.L., M.J., Z.W., H.L., L.S., B.P., H.E.S., S.H., and S.B. designed research; X.L., M.J., Z.W., H.L., L.S., B.P., S.H., and S.B. performed research; X.L., M.J., Z.W., H.L., L.S., B.P., S.H., and S.B. analyzed data; and X.L., M.J., Z.W., H.L., L.S., B.P., H.E.S., S.H., and S.B. wrote the paper.
Reviewers: A.P.G., Yale Center for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis; and V.L., Queen Mary University of London.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1707505115