Gamma-transcranial alternating current stimulation and theta-burst stimulation: inter-subject variability and the role of BDNF

•γ-tACS increases the percentage of responders to intermittent TBS from 50% to 89.3%.•γ-tACS decreases the percentage of responders to continuous TBS from 46.2% to 0%.•The Val66Met polymorphism in the BDNF gene does not influence the effects of γ-tACS. The main limitation of neuromodulation techniqu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical neurophysiology Vol. 131; no. 11; pp. 2691 - 2699
Main Authors Guerra, Andrea, Asci, Francesco, Zampogna, Alessandro, D'Onofrio, Valentina, Petrucci, Simona, Ginevrino, Monia, Berardelli, Alfredo, Suppa, Antonio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.11.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•γ-tACS increases the percentage of responders to intermittent TBS from 50% to 89.3%.•γ-tACS decreases the percentage of responders to continuous TBS from 46.2% to 0%.•The Val66Met polymorphism in the BDNF gene does not influence the effects of γ-tACS. The main limitation of neuromodulation techniques is inter-subject variability. Combining theta-burst stimulation (TBS) with gamma-transcranial alternating current stimulation (γ-tACS) allows to shape cortical plasticity. However, it is unknown whether γ-tACS modifies TBS-induced response variability. In this study, we measured the inter-subject variability of TBS-γ tACS and controlled the effect of the Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Val66Met polymorphism. Intermittent TBS (iTBS)-sham tACS, iTBS-γ tACS, continuous TBS (cTBS)-sham tACS, and cTBS-γ tACS were applied in randomised sessions. Inter-subject variability was measured using grand average and clustering methods. TBS-γ tACS effects on motor evoked potentials (MEP) were compared between Val/Val and Met carriers. We found that γ-tACS boosted iTBS-induced MEP facilitation and cancelled cTBS-induced MEP depression. Grand average analysis showed that γ-tACS prominently increased the percentage of iTBS responders and cTBS non-responders. The clustering method demonstrated that TBS-γ tACS response varied between subjects, a phenomenon unrelated to the BDNF genotype. Enhancing γ oscillations through tACS boosts iTBS-induced LTP-like plasticity and suppresses cTBS-induced LTD-like plasticity of the primary motor cortex in a reliable manner. The BDNF Val66Met polymorphism does not influence these effects. Since γ-tACS significantly increases the number of iTBS responders, it may be used in clinical settings.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1388-2457
1872-8952
1872-8952
DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2020.08.017