A unique method for estimating the reliability learning curve of optic nerve sheath diameter ultrasound measurement

Background Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement using ultrasound has been proposed as a rapid, non-invasive, point of care technique to estimate intra-cranial pressure (ICP). Ultrasonic measurement of the optic nerve sheath can be quite challenging and there is limited literature surroundi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCritical ultrasound journal Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 9 - 5
Main Authors Zeiler, Frederick A., Ziesmann, Markus T., Goeres, Patrick, Unger, Bertram, Park, Jason, Karakitsos, Dimitrios, Blaivas, Michael, Vergis, Ashley, Gillman, Lawrence M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Milan Springer Milan 01.12.2016
Springer Nature B.V
SpringerOpen
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement using ultrasound has been proposed as a rapid, non-invasive, point of care technique to estimate intra-cranial pressure (ICP). Ultrasonic measurement of the optic nerve sheath can be quite challenging and there is limited literature surrounding learning curves for this technique. We attempted to develop a method to estimate the reliability learning curve for ONSD measurement utilizing a unique definition of reliability: a plateau in within-subject variability with unchanged between-subject variability. Methods As part of a previously published study, a single operator measured the ONSD in 120 healthy volunteers over a 6-month period. Utilizing the assumption that the four measurements made on each subject during this study should be equal, the relationship of within-subject variance was described using a quadratic-plateau model as assessed by segmental polynomial (knot) regression. Results Segmental polynomial (knot) regression revealed a plateau in within-subject variance after the 21st subject. However, there was no difference in overall mean values [3.69 vs 3.68 mm ( p  = 0.884)] or between-subject variance [14.49 vs 11.92 ( p  = 0.54)] above or below this cutoff. Conclusions This study suggests a significant finite learning curve associated with ONSD measurements. It also offers a unique method of calculating the learning curve associated with ONSD measurement.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2036-3176
2036-7902
2524-8987
DOI:10.1186/s13089-016-0044-x