Strategies for diagnosis of HTLV-I and -II

BACKGROUND : No gold standard exists for diagnosis of HTLV infection. The aim of thus study was to compare the accuracy of a combination of two sensitive ELISAs with Western blot (WB), a line immunoassay, and PCR for diagnosis of HTLV infection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS : Nine hundred eighty‐five sp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTransfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Vol. 42; no. 6; pp. 780 - 791
Main Authors Thorstensson, Rigmor, Albert, Jon, Andersson, Sören
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston, MA, USA Blackwell Science Inc 01.06.2002
Blackwell Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND : No gold standard exists for diagnosis of HTLV infection. The aim of thus study was to compare the accuracy of a combination of two sensitive ELISAs with Western blot (WB), a line immunoassay, and PCR for diagnosis of HTLV infection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS : Nine hundred eighty‐five specimens were tested for the presence of HTLV antibodies by HTLV‐I and/or HTLV‐II EIAs (Murex and Ortho), WB (Diagnostic Biotechnology), line immunoassay (INNO‐LIA, Innogenetics), and/or presence of HTLV DNA by PCR. The results were compared with the probable HTLV infection status of each subject, as determined by detailed review of all available laboratory, clinical, and epidemiologic data. RESULTS : The sensitivity for diagnosis of HTLV‐I infection was high for all assays evaluated, but both PCR and WB had a lower sensitivity rate (approx., 80%) for confirmation of HTLV‐II. INNO‐LIA detected 94 percent of the HTLV‐II‐positive samples. However, Murex EIA in combination with Ortho EIA was 100‐percent sensitive for the detection of both HTLV‐I and HTLV‐II antibodies. Furthermore, the number of samples giving indeterminate results in the ELISA combination was much lower as compared with WB (2.5% vs. 50%). CONCLUSION : Based on these findings, a new, more sensitive and specific test strategy for HTLV diagnosis than the current algorithm, which includes WB, is proposed. Thereby, both the direct and indirect costs can be substantially reduced.
Bibliography:istex:6D01E5596AD469D927ECDDF0019E24CF80366065
ArticleID:tx7
ark:/67375/WNG-QDWXJB50-B
WB = Western blot.
ABBREVIATION
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0041-1132
1537-2995
DOI:10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00114.x