LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP2)-Factors associated with coverage and use of long‑lasting insecticidal nets following the 2020-21 national mass distribution campaign: a cross-sectional survey of 12 districts

• Published in: Malaria journal Vol. 21; no. 1; p. 293
• Main Authors: Okiring, Jaffer, Gonahasa, Samuel, Nassali, Martha, Namuganga, Jane F, Bagala, Irene, Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Catherine, Opigo, Jimmy, Nabende, Isaiah, Nangendo, Joanita, Kabami, Jane, Ssewanyana, Isaac, Kiwuwa, Steven M, Nankabirwa, Joaniter I, Dorsey, Grant, Briggs, Jessica, Kamya, Moses R, Staedke, Sarah G
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 19.10.2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Coverage; COVID-19 - epidemiology; Cross-Sectional Studies; Family Characteristics; Humans; Insecticide-Treated Bednets; Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs); Malaria; Mass distribution campaign; Ownership; Pandemics; Uganda; Uganda - epidemiology; Uganda; Uganda; Mass distribution campaign; Ownership; Coverage; Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs); Malaria
• ISSN: 1475-2875; 1475-2875
• DOI: 10.1186/s12936-022-04302-7

In 2020-2021, long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) were distributed nationwide in Uganda during the COVID-19 pandemic. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 12 districts to evaluate the impact of the campaign 1-5 months after LLIN distribution. During April-May 2021, households were randomly selected from target areas (1-7 villages) surrounding 12 government-run health facilities established as Malaria Reference Centres; at least 50 households were enrolled per cluster. Outcomes included household ownership of LLINs distributed through the universal coverage campaign (UCC) (at least one UCC LLIN), adequate coverage of UCC LLINs (at least one UCC LLIN per 2 residents), and use of LLINs (resident slept under a LLIN the previous night). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify household- and individual-level factors associated with outcomes, controlling for clustering around health facilities. In total, 634 households, with 3342 residents and 1631 bed-nets, were included. Most households (93.4%) owned at least 1 UCC LLIN, but only 56.8% were adequately covered by UCC LLINs. In an adjusted analysis, the factor most strongly associated with adequate coverage by UCC LLINs was fewer household residents (1-4 vs 7-14; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 12.96, 95% CI 4.76-35.26, p < 0.001; 5-6 vs 7-14 residents; aOR 2.99, 95% CI 1.21-7.42, p = 0.018). Of the 3166 residents of households that owned at least one UCC LLIN, only 1684 (53.2%) lived in adequately covered households; 89.9% of these used an LLIN the previous night, compared to 1034 (69.8%) of 1482 residents living in inadequately covered households. In an adjusted analysis, restricted to residents of inadequately covered households, LLIN use was higher in children under-five than those aged 5-15 years (aOR 3.04, 95% CI 2.08-4.46, p < 0.001), and higher in household heads than distantly-related residents (aOR 3.94, 95% CI 2.38-6.51, p < 0.001). Uganda's 2021-21 campaign was successful, despite the COVID-19 pandemic. In future campaigns, strategies should be adopted to ensure high LLIN coverage, particularly for larger households. A better understanding of the drivers of LLIN use within households is needed to guide future interventions, educational messages, and behaviour change communication strategies; school-aged children and distantly-related residents appear vulnerable and could be targeted.