The effect of treatment and clinical course during Emergency Department stay on severity scoring and predicted mortality risk in Intensive Care patients

• Published in: Critical care (London, England) Vol. 26; no. 1; p. 112
• Main Authors: Candel, Bart G J, Raven, Wouter, Lameijer, Heleen, Thijssen, Wendy A M H, Termorshuizen, Fabian, Boerma, Christiaan, de Keizer, Nicolette F, de Jonge, Evert, de Groot, Bas
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 19.04.2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: APACHE; APACHE III; Benchmarking; Care and treatment; Cohort Studies; Comparative analysis; Critical Care; Critically ill; Data quality; Emergency medicine; Emergency service; Emergency Service, Hospital; Evaluation; Hospital Mortality; Hospitals; Humans; Intensive care; Intensive Care Units; Length of Stay; Medical registries; Patient outcomes; Retrospective Studies; Treatment outcome; Netherlands; APACHE III; Medical registries; Benchmarking; Intensive care; Data quality
• ISSN: 1364-8535; 1466-609X; 1364-8535
• DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03986-2

Treatment and the clinical course during Emergency Department (ED) stay before Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission may affect predicted mortality risk calculated by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)-IV, causing lead-time bias. As a result, comparing standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) among hospitals may be difficult if they differ in the location where initial stabilization takes place. The aim of this study was to assess to what extent predicted mortality risk would be affected if the APACHE-IV score was recalculated with the initial physiological variables from the ED. Secondly, to evaluate whether ED Length of Stay (LOS) was associated with a change (delta) in these APACHE-IV scores. An observational multicenter cohort study including ICU patients admitted from the ED. Data from two Dutch quality registries were linked: the Netherlands Emergency department Evaluation Database (NEED) and the National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) registry. The ICU APACHE-IV, predicted mortality, and SMR based on data of the first 24 h of ICU admission were compared with an ED APACHE-IV model, using the most deviating physiological variables from the ED or ICU. A total of 1398 patients were included. The predicted mortality from the ICU APACHE-IV (median 0.10; IQR 0.03-0.30) was significantly lower compared to the ED APACHE-IV model (median 0.13; 0.04-0.36; p < 0.01). The SMR changed from 0.63 (95%CI 0.54-0.72) to 0.55 (95%CI 0.47-0.63) based on ED APACHE-IV. Predicted mortality risk changed more than 5% in 321 (23.2%) patients by using the ED APACHE-IV. ED LOS > 3.9 h was associated with a slight increase in delta APACHE-IV of 1.6 (95% CI 0.4-2.8) compared to ED LOS < 1.7 h. Predicted mortality risks and SMRs calculated by the APACHE IV scores are not directly comparable in patients admitted from the ED if hospitals differ in their policy to stabilize patients in the ED before ICU admission. Future research should focus on developing models to adjust for these differences.