Assessing change in national forest monitoring capacities of 99 tropical countries

•An overview of forest monitoring and reporting capacities and changes is presented.•Analysis of 99 tropical countries was done for the years 2005–2010–2015.•In 2015, a larger area of forest is monitored with good to very good capacities.•Carbon pool reporting needs improvement with use of higher Ti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inForest ecology and management Vol. 352; pp. 109 - 123
Main Authors Romijn, Erika, Lantican, Celso B., Herold, Martin, Lindquist, Erik, Ochieng, Robert, Wijaya, Arief, Murdiyarso, Daniel, Verchot, Louis
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.09.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•An overview of forest monitoring and reporting capacities and changes is presented.•Analysis of 99 tropical countries was done for the years 2005–2010–2015.•In 2015, a larger area of forest is monitored with good to very good capacities.•Carbon pool reporting needs improvement with use of higher Tiers for estimation.•Capacity building programmes have a positive effect and need to continue in future. Monitoring of forest cover and forest functions provides information necessary to support policies and decisions to conserve, protect and sustainably manage forests. Especially in the tropics where forests are declining at a rapid rate, national forest monitoring systems capable of reliably estimating forest cover, forest cover change and carbon stock change are of vital importance. As a large number of tropical countries had limited capacity in the past to implement such a system, capacity building efforts are now ongoing to strengthen the technical and political skillsets necessary to implement national forest monitoring at institutional levels. This paper assesses the current status and recent changes in national forest monitoring and reporting capacities in 99 tropical countries, using the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Forest Resources Assessment (FRA) 2015 data, complemented with FRA 2010 and FRA 2005 data. Three indicators “Forest area change monitoring and remote sensing capacities”, “Forest inventory capacities” and “Carbon pool reporting capacities” were used to assess the countries’ capacities for the years 2005, 2010 and 2015 and the change in capacities between 2005–2010 and 2010–2015. Forest area change monitoring and remote sensing capacities improved considerably between 2005 and 2015. The total tropical forest area that is monitored with good to very good forest area change monitoring and remote sensing capacities increased from 69% in 2005 to 83% in 2015. This corresponds to 1435millionha in 2005 and 1699millionha in 2015. This effect is related to more free and open remote sensing data and availability of techniques to improve forest area change monitoring. The total tropical forest area that is monitored with good to very good forest inventory capacities increased from 38% in 2005 to 66% in 2015. This corresponds to 785millionha in 2005 and 1350millionha in 2015. Carbon pool reporting capacities did not show as much improvement and the majority of countries still report at Tier 1 level. This indicates the need for greater emphasis on producing accurate emission factors at Tier 2 or Tier 3 level and improved greenhouse gases reporting. It is further shown that there was a positive adjustment in the net change in forest area where countries with lower capacities in the past had the tendency to overestimate the area of forest loss. The results emphasized the effectiveness of capacity building programmes (such as those by FAO and REDD+ readiness) but also the need for continued capacity development efforts. It is important for countries to maintain their forest monitoring system and update their inventories on a regular basis. This will further improve accuracy and reliability of data and information on forest resources and will provide countries with the necessary input to refine policies and decisions and to further improve forest management.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0378-1127
1872-7042
DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.003