Mechanical strain and fluid movement both activate extracellular regulated kinase (ERK) in osteoblast-like cells but via different signaling pathways

Extracellular regulated kinases (ERKs)-1 and -2 are members of the MAPK family of protein kinases involved in the proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of bone cells. We have shown previously that ROS 17/2.8 cells show increased activation of ERK-1 or -2, which is sustained for 24 h, when th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBone (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 31; no. 1; pp. 186 - 194
Main Authors Jessop, H.L, Rawlinson, S.C.F, Pitsillides, A.A, Lanyon, L.E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.07.2002
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Extracellular regulated kinases (ERKs)-1 and -2 are members of the MAPK family of protein kinases involved in the proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of bone cells. We have shown previously that ROS 17/2.8 cells show increased activation of ERK-1 or -2, which is sustained for 24 h, when the strips onto which they are seeded are subjected to a 10 min period of cyclic four point bending that produces physiological levels of mechanical strain along with associated fluid movement of the medium. Movement of the strips through the medium without bending causes fluid movement without strain. This also increases ERK-1/2 activation, but in a biphasic manner over the same time period. Our present study investigates the role of components of signaling pathways in the activation of ERK-1/2 in ROS 17/2.8 cells in response to these stimuli. Using a range of inhibitors we show specific differences by which ERK-1 and ERK-2 are activated in response to fluid movement alone, compared with those induced in response to strain plus its associated fluid movement. ERK-1 activation induced by fluid movement was markedly reduced by nifedipine, and therefore appears to involve L-type calcium channels, but was unaffected by either L-NAME or indomethacin. This suggests independence from prostacyclin (PGI2) and nitric oxide (NO) production. In contrast, ERK-1 activation induced by application of strain (and its associated fluid disturbance) was abrogated by TMB-8 hydrochloride, L-NAME, and indomethacin. This suggests that strain-induced ERK-1 activation is dependent upon calcium mobilization from intracellular stores and production of NO and PGI2. ERK-2 activation appears to be mediated by a separate mechanism in these cells. Its activation by fluid movement alone involved both PGI2 and NO production, but its activation by strain was not affected by any of the inhibitors used. The G protein inhibitor, pertussis toxin, did not cause a reduction in the activation of ERK-1 or -2 in response to either stimulus. These results are consistent with earlier observations of ERK activation in bone cells in response to both strain (with fluid movement) and fluid movement alone, and further demonstrate that these phenomena stimulate distinct signaling pathways.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:8756-3282
1873-2763
DOI:10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00797-4