Minimally invasive trans-superior articular process percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy with robot assistance
To compare the clinical outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation treated with robot-assisted percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (r-PELD) or conventional PELD under fluoroscopy guidance (f-PELD). Our study group included 55 patients, 22 in the r-PELD group and 33 in the f-PELD group. T...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 1144 - 8 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
31.12.2022
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To compare the clinical outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation treated with robot-assisted percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (r-PELD) or conventional PELD under fluoroscopy guidance (f-PELD).
Our study group included 55 patients, 22 in the r-PELD group and 33 in the f-PELD group. The following clinical and surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups: the visual analog scale for radiculopathy pain; Oswestry Disability Index; intraoperative volume of blood loss; frequency of fluoroscopy used during the procedure; and MacNab classification. The follow-up period was 6-8 months.
Compared with f-PELD, r-PELD was associated with a lower volume of intraoperative blood loss and frequency of fluoroscopy (p < 0.01). There were no differences in complications, MacNab classification, postoperative disability and leg pain, and duration of hospitalization between the two groups.
Based on our findings, r-PELD provides a safe and effective alternative to conventional PELD for the treatment of lumbar disc herniations, with the accuracy for placement of punctures lowering radiation exposure. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1471-2474 1471-2474 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12891-022-06060-8 |