What Do We Know About the “Malignant Form” of Early Repolarization?

There is an urgent need to identify electrocardiographic characteristics that differentiate the “benign early repolarization pattern” from “malignant early repolarization.” In a previous paper, we considered the different electrocardiographic elements of the early repolarization pattern and analyzed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 62; no. 10; pp. 863 - 868
Main Authors Adler, Arnon, MD, Rosso, Raphael, MD, Viskin, Dana, Halkin, Amir, MD, Viskin, Sami, MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 03.09.2013
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There is an urgent need to identify electrocardiographic characteristics that differentiate the “benign early repolarization pattern” from “malignant early repolarization.” In a previous paper, we considered the different electrocardiographic elements of the early repolarization pattern and analyzed how they confer important prognostic information. In the present article, we review more recent information regarding the importance of the contour of the ST segment, with special emphasis on the currently termed malignant form and its value for risk stratification in early repolarization.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.054