Conversational Exercitives and the Force of Pornography
Many theorists, such as Catharine MacKinnon, argue that certain forms of speech currently protected under the First Amendment (e.g., pornography) ought to be prohibited. Theorist Rae Langton defends the coherence of MacKinnon's claims by offering a speech act analysis of pornography. McGowan pr...
Saved in:
Published in | Philosophy & public affairs Vol. 31; no. 2; pp. 155 - 189 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.04.2003
Princeton University Press Princeton University Blackwell |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Many theorists, such as Catharine MacKinnon, argue that certain forms of speech currently protected under the First Amendment (e.g., pornography) ought to be prohibited. Theorist Rae Langton defends the coherence of MacKinnon's claims by offering a speech act analysis of pornography. McGowan presents five challenges to Langton's analysis of pornography. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:ECFB259C27150CE816FBB54330BDFF17AB2B9186 ArticleID:PAPA155 ark:/67375/WNG-CK6KL3GJ-7 Philosophy & Public Affairs for helpful comments on earlier drafts. I also thank members of the Workshop on Gender and Philosophy at MIT and the audience at my Women in Philosophy talk at Harvard University where I presented this paper. Finally, I thank the American Association of University Women for the research leave enabling my work on this project among others. I thank David Lewis, Sally Haslanger, Rae Langton, and the Editors of ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0048-3915 1088-4963 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2003.00155.x |