Conversational Exercitives and the Force of Pornography

Many theorists, such as Catharine MacKinnon, argue that certain forms of speech currently protected under the First Amendment (e.g., pornography) ought to be prohibited. Theorist Rae Langton defends the coherence of MacKinnon's claims by offering a speech act analysis of pornography. McGowan pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhilosophy & public affairs Vol. 31; no. 2; pp. 155 - 189
Main Author McGOWAN, MARY KATE
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2003
Princeton University Press
Princeton University
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Many theorists, such as Catharine MacKinnon, argue that certain forms of speech currently protected under the First Amendment (e.g., pornography) ought to be prohibited. Theorist Rae Langton defends the coherence of MacKinnon's claims by offering a speech act analysis of pornography. McGowan presents five challenges to Langton's analysis of pornography.
Bibliography:istex:ECFB259C27150CE816FBB54330BDFF17AB2B9186
ArticleID:PAPA155
ark:/67375/WNG-CK6KL3GJ-7
Philosophy & Public Affairs
for helpful comments on earlier drafts. I also thank members of the Workshop on Gender and Philosophy at MIT and the audience at my Women in Philosophy talk at Harvard University where I presented this paper. Finally, I thank the American Association of University Women for the research leave enabling my work on this project among others.
I thank David Lewis, Sally Haslanger, Rae Langton, and the Editors of
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0048-3915
1088-4963
DOI:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2003.00155.x