Comparison of the prevalence of bacterial enteropathogens, potentially zoonotic bacteria and bacterial resistance to antimicrobials in organic and conventional poultry, swine and beef production: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The prevalences of zoonotic and potentially zoonotic bacteria or bacteria resistant to antimicrobials in organic and conventional poultry, swine and beef production were compared using systematic review and meta-analysis methodology. Thirty-eight articles were included in the review. The prevalence...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEpidemiology and infection Vol. 137; no. 9; pp. 1217 - 1232
Main Authors YOUNG, I., RAJIĆ, A., WILHELM, B. J., WADDELL, L., PARKER, S., McEWEN, S. A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.09.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The prevalences of zoonotic and potentially zoonotic bacteria or bacteria resistant to antimicrobials in organic and conventional poultry, swine and beef production were compared using systematic review and meta-analysis methodology. Thirty-eight articles were included in the review. The prevalence of Campylobacter was higher in organic broiler chickens at slaughter, but no difference in prevalence was observed in retail chicken. Campylobacter isolates from conventional retail chicken were more likely to be ciprofloxacin-resistant (odds ratio 9·62, 95% confidence interval 5·67–16·35). Bacteria isolated from conventional animal production exhibited a higher prevalence of resistance to antimicrobials; however, the recovery of some resistant strains was also identified in organic animal production, where there is an apparent reduced antimicrobial selection pressure. Limited or inconsistent research was identified in studies examining the prevalence of zoonotic and potentially zoonotic bacteria in other food-animal species. There is a need for further research of sufficient quality in this area.
Bibliography:istex:2669C9572596CD281B82851DFD6C11AD7CC806A8
PII:S0950268809002635
ArticleID:00263
ark:/67375/6GQ-TTTL7H41-T
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0950-2688
1469-4409
DOI:10.1017/S0950268809002635