A randomized comparison of oral chloramphenicol versus ofloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated typhoid fever in Laos

We conducted a randomized open trial of oral chloramphenicol (50 mg/kg/day in four divided doses for 14 days) versus ofloxacin (15 mg/kg/day in two divided doses for 3 days) in 50 adults with culture-confirmed uncomplicated typhoid fever in Vientiane, Laos. Patients had been ill for a median (range)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Vol. 99; no. 6; pp. 451 - 458
Main Authors Phongmany, Simmaly, Phetsouvanh, Rattanaphone, Sisouphone, Siho, Darasavath, Chirapha, Vongphachane, Pankham, Rattanavong, Oudayvone, Mayxay, Mayfong, Ramsay, Andrew C., Blacksell, Stuart D., Thammavong, Chanpheng, Syhavong, Bounkong, White, Nicholas J., Newton, Paul N.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2005
Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We conducted a randomized open trial of oral chloramphenicol (50 mg/kg/day in four divided doses for 14 days) versus ofloxacin (15 mg/kg/day in two divided doses for 3 days) in 50 adults with culture-confirmed uncomplicated typhoid fever in Vientiane, Laos. Patients had been ill for a median (range) of 8 (2–30) days. All Salmonella enterica serotype typhi isolates were nalidixic acid-sensitive, four (8%) were chloramphenicol-resistant and three (6%) were multidrug-resistant. Median (range) fever clearance times were 90 (24–224) hours in the chloramphenicol group and 54 (6–93) hours in the ofloxacin group ( P < 0.001). One patient in the chloramphenicol group developed an ileal perforation. Three days ofloxacin was more effective than 14 days chloramphenicol for the in-patient treatment of typhoid fever, irrespective of antibiotic susceptibility, and was of similar cost.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/HXZ-05BKCRL8-W
istex:681F173CAF1B87371380EC479F15E2299E1731D8
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0035-9203
1878-3503
DOI:10.1016/j.trstmh.2004.08.007