A randomized comparison of oral chloramphenicol versus ofloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated typhoid fever in Laos
We conducted a randomized open trial of oral chloramphenicol (50 mg/kg/day in four divided doses for 14 days) versus ofloxacin (15 mg/kg/day in two divided doses for 3 days) in 50 adults with culture-confirmed uncomplicated typhoid fever in Vientiane, Laos. Patients had been ill for a median (range)...
Saved in:
Published in | Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Vol. 99; no. 6; pp. 451 - 458 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Elsevier Ltd
01.06.2005
Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | We conducted a randomized open trial of oral chloramphenicol (50
mg/kg/day in four divided doses for 14 days) versus ofloxacin (15
mg/kg/day in two divided doses for 3 days) in 50 adults with culture-confirmed uncomplicated typhoid fever in Vientiane, Laos. Patients had been ill for a median (range) of 8 (2–30) days. All
Salmonella enterica serotype typhi isolates were nalidixic acid-sensitive, four (8%) were chloramphenicol-resistant and three (6%) were multidrug-resistant. Median (range) fever clearance times were 90 (24–224) hours in the chloramphenicol group and 54 (6–93) hours in the ofloxacin group (
P
<
0.001). One patient in the chloramphenicol group developed an ileal perforation. Three days ofloxacin was more effective than 14 days chloramphenicol for the in-patient treatment of typhoid fever, irrespective of antibiotic susceptibility, and was of similar cost. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/HXZ-05BKCRL8-W istex:681F173CAF1B87371380EC479F15E2299E1731D8 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-News-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0035-9203 1878-3503 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.trstmh.2004.08.007 |