Recent advances in the study of immunodeficiency and DNA damage response

DNA breaks can be induced by exogenous stimuli or by endogenous stress, but are also generated during recombination of V, D, and J genes (V(D)J recombination), immunoglobulin class switch recombination (CSR). Among various DNA breaks generated, DNA double strand break (DSB) is the most deleterious o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational Journal of Hematology Vol. 106; no. 3; pp. 357 - 365
Main Author Morio, Tomohiro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Tokyo Springer Science and Business Media LLC 01.09.2017
Springer Japan
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:DNA breaks can be induced by exogenous stimuli or by endogenous stress, but are also generated during recombination of V, D, and J genes (V(D)J recombination), immunoglobulin class switch recombination (CSR). Among various DNA breaks generated, DNA double strand break (DSB) is the most deleterious one. DNA damage response (DDR) is initiated when DSBs are detected, leading to DNA break repair by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). The process is critically important for the generation of diversity for foreign antigens; and failure to exert DNA repair leads to immunodeficiency such as severe combined immunodeficiency and hyper-IgM syndrome. In V(D)J recombination, DSBs are induced by RAG1/2; and generated post-cleavage hairpins are resolved by Artemis/DNA-PKcs/KU70/KU80. DDR is initiated by ataxia-telangiectasia mutated as a master regulator together with MRE11/RAD50/NBS1 complex. Finally, DSBs are repaired by NHEJ. The defect of one of the molecules shows various degree of immunodeficiency and radiosensitivity. Upon CSR inducing signal, DSBs induced by activation-induced cytidine deaminase and endonucleases elicit DDR. Broken ends are repaired either by NHEJ or by mismatch repair system. Patients with radiosensitive SCID require hematopoietic cell transplantation as a curative therapy; but the procedures for eradication of recipient hematopoietic cells are often associated with severe toxicity.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0925-5710
1865-3774
1865-3774
DOI:10.1007/s12185-017-2263-8