Fourteen-day vonoprazan and low- or high-dose amoxicillin dual therapy for eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection: A prospective, open-labeled, randomized non-inferiority clinical study

We previously reported that vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy for 7 or 10 days is not satisfactorily efficacious for ( ) eradication. We aimed to explore the efficacy of VA dual therapy for 14 days as a first-line treatment for infection. This was a single center, prospective, open-labeled, r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in immunology Vol. 13; p. 1049908
Main Authors Hu, Yi, Xu, Xin, Liu, Xiao-Shun, He, Cong, Ouyang, Yao-Bin, Li, Nian-Shuang, Xie, Chuan, Peng, Chao, Zhu, Zhen-Hua, Xie, Yong, Shu, Xu, Zhu, Yin, Graham, David Y., Lu, Nong-Hua
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 13.01.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We previously reported that vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy for 7 or 10 days is not satisfactorily efficacious for ( ) eradication. We aimed to explore the efficacy of VA dual therapy for 14 days as a first-line treatment for infection. This was a single center, prospective, open-labeled, randomized non-inferiority clinical study conducted in China. Treatment naïve infected patients were randomized into two groups: 20 mg vonoprazan (VPZ) b.i.d. in combination with low-dose (1000 mg b.i.d.) or high-dose (1000 mg t.i.d) amoxicillin for 14 days. C-urea breath tests were used to access the cure rate at least 4 weeks after treatment. A total of 154 patients were assessed and 110 subjects were randomized. The eradication rate of VPZ with b.i.d. amoxicillin or t.i.d. amoxicillin for 14 days was 89.1% and 87.3% by intention-to-treat analysis, respectively, and 94.1% and 95.9% by per-protocol analysis, respectively. The eradication rate and incidence of adverse events were not different between the two groups. VPZ with b.i.d. or t.i.d. amoxicillin for 14 days provides satisfactory efficacy as a first-line treatment for infection in China.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Mitsushige Sugimoto, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Japan; Anna Katrina Walduck, RMIT University, Australia
Edited by: Antonio Di Sabatino, University of Pavia, Italy
This article was submitted to Mucosal Immunity, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology
These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
These authors have contributed equally to this work and share last authorship
ISSN:1664-3224
1664-3224
DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2022.1049908