Protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection by a mucosal vaccine in rhesus macaques

Effective SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are urgently needed. Although most vaccine strategies have focused on systemic immunization, here we compared the protective efficacy of 2 adjuvanted subunit vaccines with spike protein S1: an intramuscularly primed/boosted vaccine and an intramuscularly primed/intranas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJCI insight Vol. 6; no. 10
Main Authors Sui, Yongjun, Li, Jianping, Zhang, Roushu, Prabhu, Sunaina Kiran, Andersen, Hanne, Venzon, David, Cook, Anthony, Brown, Renita, Teow, Elyse, Velasco, Jason, Greenhouse, Jack, Putman-Taylor, Tammy, Campbell, Tracey-Ann, Pessaint, Laurent, Moore, Ian N., Lagenaur, Laurel, Talton, Jim, Breed, Matthew W., Kramer, Josh, Bock, Kevin W., Minai, Mahnaz, Nagata, Bianca M., Lewis, Mark G., Wang, Lai-Xi, Berzofsky, Jay A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Society for Clinical Investigation 28.04.2021
American Society for Clinical investigation
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Effective SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are urgently needed. Although most vaccine strategies have focused on systemic immunization, here we compared the protective efficacy of 2 adjuvanted subunit vaccines with spike protein S1: an intramuscularly primed/boosted vaccine and an intramuscularly primed/intranasally boosted mucosal vaccine in rhesus macaques. The intramuscular-alum-only vaccine induced robust binding and neutralizing antibody and persistent cellular immunity systemically and mucosally, whereas intranasal boosting with nanoparticles, including IL-15 and TLR agonists, elicited weaker T cell and Ab responses but higher dimeric IgA and IFN-α. Nevertheless, following SARS-CoV-2 challenge, neither group showed detectable subgenomic RNA in upper or lower respiratory tracts versus naive controls, indicating full protection against viral replication. Although mucosal and systemic protective mechanisms may differ, results demonstrate both vaccines can protect against respiratory SARS-CoV-2 exposure. In summary, we have demonstrated that the mucosal vaccine was safe after multiple doses and cleared the input virus more efficiently in the nasal cavity and thus may act as a potent complementary reinforcing boost for conventional systemic vaccines to provide overall better protection.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2379-3708
2379-3708
DOI:10.1172/jci.insight.148494