Localization of agonist and competitive antagonist binding sites on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

• Published in: Neurochemistry international Vol. 36; no. 7; pp. 595 - 645
• Main Author: Arias, Hugo Rubén
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2000; Elsevier
• Subjects: a-Bungarotoxin; Animals; Binding Sites; Binding, Competitive; Biological and medical sciences; Cell receptors; Cell structures and functions; conotoxins; epibatidine; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Molecular and cellular biology; Monoamines receptors (catecholamine, serotonine, histamine, acetylcholine); Mutation - physiology; Nicotinic Agonists - metabolism; Nicotinic Antagonists - metabolism; Receptors, Nicotinic - chemistry; Receptors, Nicotinic - genetics; Receptors, Nicotinic - metabolism; Tissue Distribution; GABA AR, γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor; DAPA, bis(3-azidopyridinium)-1; CCh, carbamylcholine; UV, ultraviolet; 10-decane perchlorate; EPR, electron paramagnetic resonance; MBTA, 4-( N-maleimido)benzyltrimethylammonium iodide; ATP receptor; DHβE, dihydro-β-erythroidine; κ-BTx, κ-bungarotoxin; NCI, noncompetitive inhibitor; tacrine, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-9-amino-acridine; glycine receptor; DMT, dimethyl- d-tubocurarine; 5-HT 3R, 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor; N-(dimethylamino)phenyldiazonium fluoroborate; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; DDF, p- N; GABA CR, γ-aminobutyric acid type C receptor; 5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine; C 12-eosin, 5-( N-dodecanoyl)aminoeosin; NBD, 4-[ N-[(acetoxyethyl]- N-methylamino]-7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1; GlyR; MTSET, [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]methanetiosulfonate; GluR; BCNI, bis(choline)- N-(4-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1; TC, d-tubocurarine; ACh mustard, 2-[( N-2′-chloroethyl)- N-methylamino]ethyl acetate; 5-SASL, 5-doxylstearate; FRET, fluorescence resonance energy transfer; C 18-rhodamine, octadecyl rhodamine B; TDF, trimethylammonium diazonium fluoroborate; AChR, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; K d, apparent dissociation constant; BrACh, bromoacetylcholine; AChE, acetylcholinesterase; ACh, acetylcholine; MPTA, 4-( N-maleimido)phenyltrimethylammonium iodide; 3-diazole; glutamate receptor; dansyl-C 6-choline, 6-(5-dimethylaminonaphtalene-1-sulfonamido)hexanoic acid-β-( N-trimethylammonium)ethyl ester; 3-diazol-7-yl)-iminodiproprionate; κ-FTx, κ-flavitoxin; P2XR; α-CTx, α-cobratoxin; α-BTx, α-bungarotoxin; Cholinergic receptor; Agonist; Acetylcholine; Binding site; Antagonist; Localization; Nicotinic receptor
• ISSN: 0197-0186; 1872-9754
• DOI: 10.1016/S0197-0186(99)00154-0

Identification of all residues involved in the recognition and binding of cholinergic ligands (e.g. agonists, competitive antagonists, and noncompetitive agonists) is a primary objective to understand which structural components are related to the physiological function of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR). The picture for the localization of the agonist/competitive antagonist binding sites is now clearer in the light of newer and better experimental evidence. These sites are located mainly on both α subunits in a pocket approximately 30–35 Å above the surface membrane. Since both α subunits are identical, the observed high and low affinity for different ligands on the receptor is conditioned by the interaction of the α subunit with other non-α subunits. This molecular interaction takes place at the interface formed by the different subunits. For example, the high-affinity acetylcholine (ACh) binding site of the muscle-type AChR is located on the αδ subunit interface, whereas the low-affinity ACh binding site is located on the αγ subunit interface. Regarding homomeric AChRs (e.g. α7, α8, and α9), up to five binding sites may be located on the αα subunit interfaces. From the point of view of subunit arrangement, the γ subunit is in between both α subunits and the δ subunit follows the α aligned in a clockwise manner from the γ. Although some competitive antagonists such as lophotoxin and α-bungarotoxin bind to the same high- and low-affinity sites as ACh, other cholinergic drugs may bind with opposite specificity. For instance, the location of the high- and the low-affinity binding site for curare-related drugs as well as for agonists such as the alkaloid nicotine and the potent analgesic epibatidine (only when the AChR is in the desensitized state) is determined by the αγ and the αδ subunit interface, respectively. The case of α-conotoxins (α-CoTxs) is unique since each α-CoTx from different species is recognized by a specific AChR type. In addition, the specificity of α-CoTxs for each subunit interface is species-dependent. In general terms we may state that both α subunits carry the principal component for the agonist/competitive antagonist binding sites, whereas the non-α subunits bear the complementary component. Concerning homomeric AChRs, both the principal and the complementary component exist on the α subunit. The principal component on the muscle-type AChR involves three loops-forming binding domains (loops A–C). Loop A (from mouse sequence) is mainly formed by residue Y 93, loop B is molded by amino acids W 149, Y 152, and probably G 153, while loop C is shaped by residues Y 190, C 192, C 193, and Y 198. The complementary component corresponding to each non-α subunit probably contributes with at least four loops. More specifically, the loops at the γ subunit are: loop D which is formed by residue K 34, loop E that is designed by W 55 and E 57, loop F which is built by a stretch of amino acids comprising L 109, S 111, C 115, I 116, and Y 117, and finally loop G that is shaped by F 172 and by the negatively-charged amino acids D 174 and E 183. The complementary component on the δ subunit, which corresponds to the high-affinity ACh binding site, is formed by homologous loops. Regarding α-neurotoxins, several snake and α-CoTxs bear specific residues that are energetically coupled with their corresponding pairs on the AChR binding site. The principal component for snake α-neurotoxins is located on the residue sequence α1W 184–D 200, which includes loop C. In addition, amino acid sequence 55–74 from the α1 subunit (which includes loop E), and residues γL 119 (close to loop F) and γE 176 (close to loop G) at the low-affinity binding site, or δL 121 (close to the homologous region of loop G) at the high-affinity binding site, are involved in snake α-neurotoxin binding. The above expounded evidence indicates that each cholinergic molecule binds to specific residues which form overlapping binding sites on the AChR. Monoclonal antibodies have been of fundamental importance in the elucidation of several aspects of the biology of the AChR. Interestingly, certain antibodies partially overlap with the agonist/competitive antagonist binding sites at multiple points of contact. In this regard, a monoclonal antibody directed against the high-affinity ACh binding site (αδ subunit interface) induced a structural change on the AChR where the low-affinity ACh locus (αγ subunit interface) approached to the lipid membrane. The α subunits also carry the binding site for noncompetitive agonists. Noncompetitive agonists such as the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (−)-physostigmine, the alkaloid galanthamine, and the opioid derivative codeine are molecules that weakly activate the receptor without interacting with the classical agonist binding sites. This binding site was found to be located at K 125 in an amphipathic domain of the extracellular portion of the α1 subunit. Interestingly, the neurotransmitter 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) also binds to this site and enhances the agonist-induced ion flux activity. This suggests that 5-HT may act as an endogenous modulator (probably as co-agonist) of neuronal-type AChRs. The enhancement of the agonist-evoked currents elicited by noncompetitive agonists seems to be physiologically more important than their weak agonist properties.