Common, Emerging, Vector-Borne and Infrequent Abortogenic Virus Infections of Cattle

Summary This review deals with the aetiology and the diagnosis of bovine viral abortion. While the abortion rates on beef and dairy cattle farms usually do not exceed 10%, significant economic losses because of abortion storms may be encountered. Determining the cause of abortions is usually a chall...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTransboundary and emerging diseases Vol. 59; no. 1; pp. 11 - 25
Main Authors Ali, H., Ali, A. A., Atta, M. S., Cepica, A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2012
Hindawi Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary This review deals with the aetiology and the diagnosis of bovine viral abortion. While the abortion rates on beef and dairy cattle farms usually do not exceed 10%, significant economic losses because of abortion storms may be encountered. Determining the cause of abortions is usually a challenge, and it generally remains obscure in more than 50% of the necropsy submitted foetuses. Bovine viral diarrhoea virus and bovine herpesvirus‐1 are the most common viruses causally associated with bovine abortions in farmed cattle globally. Rift Valley fever virus and bluetongue virus are important insect‐transmitted abortogenic viruses. The geographic distribution of these two viruses is primarily dependent on the distribution of the insect vector, but direct transmission is possible. Recent global warming and subsequent insect vector expansion, coupled with the increase in international trade of animals and animal products, have been important factors in recent geographic advances of those two viruses. Bovine herpesviruses‐4 and 5 in cattle, as well as other less frequent vector‐borne viruses including epizootic haemorrhagic disease virus, Aino virus, Wesselsbron virus and lumpy skin disease virus, are discussed.
Bibliography:istex:13455A36078CA05CE527A7C365E1DD417C52A70F
ark:/67375/WNG-93QS0JK7-L
ArticleID:TBED1240
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1865-1674
1865-1682
DOI:10.1111/j.1865-1682.2011.01240.x