Interaction of Campylobacter spp. and Human Probiotics in Chicken Intestinal Mucus

Summary Campylobacter is the most common cause of bacterial food‐borne diarrhoeal disease throughout the world. The principal risk of human contamination is handling and consumption of contaminated poultry meat. To colonize poultry, Campylobacter adheres to and persists in the mucus layer that cover...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inZoonoses and public health Vol. 60; no. 2; pp. 141 - 148
Main Authors Ganan, M., Martinez-Rodriguez, A. J., Carrascosa, A.V., Vesterlund, S., Salminen, S., Satokari, R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Campylobacter is the most common cause of bacterial food‐borne diarrhoeal disease throughout the world. The principal risk of human contamination is handling and consumption of contaminated poultry meat. To colonize poultry, Campylobacter adheres to and persists in the mucus layer that covers the intestinal epithelium. Inhibiting adhesion to the mucus could prevent colonization of the intestine. The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro the protective effect of defined commercial human probiotic strains on the adhesion of Campylobacter spp. to chicken intestinal mucus, in a search for alternatives to antibiotics to control this food‐borne pathogen. The probiotic strains Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Propionibacterium freudenreichii ssp. shermanii JS and a starter culture strain Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis adhered well to chicken intestinal mucus and were able to reduce the binding of Campylobacter spp. when the mucus was colonized with the probiotic strain before contacting the pathogen. Human‐intended probiotics could be useful as prophylactics in poultry feeding for controlling Campylobacter spp. colonization.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-CF1JTQ4P-7
istex:5634F5087608A551646A70B2CA96F9ECDF558D06
ArticleID:ZPH1510
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1863-1959
1863-2378
DOI:10.1111/j.1863-2378.2012.01510.x