Self-measured home blood pressure in predicting ambulatory hypertension

Physicians are commonly uncertain whether a person with office blood pressure (BP) around 140/90 mm Hg actually has hypertension. This is primarily because of BP variability. One approach is to perform self-measured home BP and determine if home BP is elevated. There is a general agreement that if h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of hypertension Vol. 17; no. 11; pp. 1017 - 1022
Main Authors Mansoor, George A., White, William B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.11.2004
Oxford University Press
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Physicians are commonly uncertain whether a person with office blood pressure (BP) around 140/90 mm Hg actually has hypertension. This is primarily because of BP variability. One approach is to perform self-measured home BP and determine if home BP is elevated. There is a general agreement that if home BP is ≥135/85 mm Hg, then antihypertensive therapy may be commenced. However, some persons with home BP below this cut-off will have ambulatory hypertension. We therefore prospectively study the role of home BP in predicting ambulatory hypertension in persons with stage 1 and borderline hypertension. We studied in a cross-sectional way home and ambulatory BP in a group of 48 patients with at least two elevated office BP readings. The group was free of antihypertensive drug therapy for at least 4 weeks and performed 7 days of standardized self-BP measurements at home. We examined the relationships of the three BP methods and also defined a threshold (using receiver operating curves) for home BP that captures 80% of ambulatory hypertensives (awake BP ≥135/85 mm Hg). Office systolic BP (145 ± 13 mm Hg) was significantly higher than awake (139 ± 12 mm Hg, P = .013) and home (132 ± 11 mm Hg, P < .001) BP. Office diastolic BP (88 ± 4 mm Hg) was higher than home diastolic BP (80 ± 8 mm Hg, P < .001) but not different from awake diastolic BP (88 ± 8 mm Hg, P = .10). Home BP had a higher correlation (compared with office BP) with ambulatory BP. The home BP-based white coat effect correlated with ambulatory BP-based white coat effect ( r = 0.83, P = .001 for systolic BP; r = 0.68, P = .001 for diastolic BP). The threshold for home BP of 80% sensitivity in capturing ambulatory hypertension was 125/76 mm Hg. Our preliminary data suggest that a lower self-monitored home BP threshold should be used (to exclude ambulatory hypertension) in patients with borderline office hypertension.
Bibliography:href:17_11_1017.pdf
istex:D778130FF0BC829614AEE45736A36402DB045784
This study was supported in part by General Clinical Research Center Grants (MO1-RR-06192 and K23 RR 15545) from the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD), and by grants from the Catherine and Patrick Donaghue Medical Research Foundation (Hartford, CT).
ark:/67375/HXZ-9TSM1G62-G
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0895-7061
1879-1905
1941-7225
DOI:10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.06.015