Self-measured home blood pressure in predicting ambulatory hypertension
Physicians are commonly uncertain whether a person with office blood pressure (BP) around 140/90 mm Hg actually has hypertension. This is primarily because of BP variability. One approach is to perform self-measured home BP and determine if home BP is elevated. There is a general agreement that if h...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of hypertension Vol. 17; no. 11; pp. 1017 - 1022 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, NY
Elsevier Inc
01.11.2004
Oxford University Press Elsevier Science |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Physicians are commonly uncertain whether a person with office blood pressure (BP) around 140/90 mm Hg actually has hypertension. This is primarily because of BP variability. One approach is to perform self-measured home BP and determine if home BP is elevated. There is a general agreement that if home BP is ≥135/85 mm Hg, then antihypertensive therapy may be commenced. However, some persons with home BP below this cut-off will have ambulatory hypertension. We therefore prospectively study the role of home BP in predicting ambulatory hypertension in persons with stage 1 and borderline hypertension.
We studied in a cross-sectional way home and ambulatory BP in a group of 48 patients with at least two elevated office BP readings. The group was free of antihypertensive drug therapy for at least 4 weeks and performed 7 days of standardized self-BP measurements at home. We examined the relationships of the three BP methods and also defined a threshold (using receiver operating curves) for home BP that captures 80% of ambulatory hypertensives (awake BP ≥135/85 mm Hg).
Office systolic BP (145 ± 13 mm Hg) was significantly higher than awake (139 ± 12 mm Hg,
P = .013) and home (132 ± 11 mm Hg,
P < .001) BP. Office diastolic BP (88 ± 4 mm Hg) was higher than home diastolic BP (80 ± 8 mm Hg,
P < .001) but not different from awake diastolic BP (88 ± 8 mm Hg,
P = .10). Home BP had a higher correlation (compared with office BP) with ambulatory BP. The home BP-based white coat effect correlated with ambulatory BP-based white coat effect (
r = 0.83,
P = .001 for systolic BP;
r = 0.68,
P = .001 for diastolic BP). The threshold for home BP of 80% sensitivity in capturing ambulatory hypertension was 125/76 mm Hg.
Our preliminary data suggest that a lower self-monitored home BP threshold should be used (to exclude ambulatory hypertension) in patients with borderline office hypertension. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | href:17_11_1017.pdf istex:D778130FF0BC829614AEE45736A36402DB045784 This study was supported in part by General Clinical Research Center Grants (MO1-RR-06192 and K23 RR 15545) from the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD), and by grants from the Catherine and Patrick Donaghue Medical Research Foundation (Hartford, CT). ark:/67375/HXZ-9TSM1G62-G ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0895-7061 1879-1905 1941-7225 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.06.015 |