Effect of Gonadotropin Types and Indications on Homologous Intrauterine Insemination Success: A Study from 1251 Cycles and a Review of the Literature

Objective. To evaluate the IUI success factors relative to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and infertility type, this retrospective cohort study included 1251 couples undergoing homologous IUI. Results. We achieved 13% clinical pregnancies and 11% live births. COS and infertility type do not ha...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBioMed research international Vol. 2017; no. 2017; pp. 1 - 12
Main Authors Benkhalifa, Moncef, Copin, Henri, Chahine, Hickmat, Devaux, Aviva, Lourdel, Emmanuelle, Belloc, Stephanie, Belhadri-Mansouri, Naima, Scheffler, Florence, Cabry-Goubet, Rosalie, De Mouzon, Jacques
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cairo, Egypt Hindawi Publishing Corporation 01.01.2017
Hindawi
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Hindawi Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective. To evaluate the IUI success factors relative to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and infertility type, this retrospective cohort study included 1251 couples undergoing homologous IUI. Results. We achieved 13% clinical pregnancies and 11% live births. COS and infertility type do not have significant effect on IUI clinical outcomes with unstable intervention of various couples’ parameters, including the female age, the IUI attempt rank, and the sperm quality. Conclusion. Further, the COS used seemed a weak predictor for IUI success; therefore, the indications need more discussion, especially in unexplained infertility cases involving various factors. Indeed, the fourth IUI attempt, the female age over 40 years, and the total motile sperm count <5 × 106 were critical in decreasing the positive clinical outcomes of IUI. Those parameter cut-offs necessitate a larger analysis to give infertile couples more chances through IUI before carrying out other ART techniques.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
PMCID: PMC5745683
Academic Editor: Marco Scioscia
ISSN:2314-6133
2314-6141
DOI:10.1155/2017/3512784