Time and motion study to compare electronic and hybrid data collection systems during the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination campaign

• Published in: Vaccine Vol. 29; no. 10; pp. 1997 - 2003
• Main Authors: Quach, Susan, Hamid, Jemila S, Pereira, Jennifer A, Heidebrecht, Christine L, Foisy, Julie, Bettinger, Julie A, Rosella, Laura, Crowcroft, Natasha S, Deeks, Shelley L, Quan, Sherman D, Finkelstein, Michael, Guay, Maryse, Buckeridge, David L, Sikora, Christopher A, Kwong, Jeffrey C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 24.02.2011; Elsevier; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Allergy and Immunology; Applied microbiology; Automatic Data Processing - methods; Biological and medical sciences; Canada; Clinics; Confidence intervals; Data collection; Data Collection - methods; Data entry; Electronic Health Records; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Humans; hybrids; Immunization; Influenza; Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype - immunology; Influenza Vaccines - administration & dosage; Methods; Microbiology; Miscellaneous; pandemic; Pandemics; Population; Public health; Reporting requirements; Time and motion studies; Time Factors; vaccination; Vaccines; Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies (general aspects); Virology; Canada; paper client registration; P; Immunization; paper; ECR; E; Influenza; electronic client registration; electronic; Time and motion studies; PCR; Infection; Virus; Influenzavirus A; Influenza A virus; Viral disease; Vaccination; Orthomyxoviridae; Vaccine
• ISSN: 0264-410X; 1873-2518
• DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.09.016

Abstract During the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccination campaign, vaccine providers collected immunization data using hybrid (paper-based and electronic methods) and electronic data systems. We measured staff time in seconds spent on data collection tasks to compare system efficiencies. The sample consisted of 38 organizations across nine Canadian provinces/territories. The total mean data collection times per client were 104 s (electronic system), 143 s (hybrid system with electronic registration) and 172 s (hybrid system with paper registration). Electronic registration and record keeping were faster than paper-based methods; these findings should be used to improve data collection for future influenza seasons.