Kinematic characterization of clinically observed aberrant movement patterns in patients with non-specific low back pain: a cross-sectional study

• Published in: BMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 18; no. 1; p. 455
• Main Authors: Wattananon, Peemongkon, Ebaugh, David, Biely, Scott A, Smith, Susan S, Hicks, Gregory E, Silfies, Sheri P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 15.11.2017; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Aberrant movement patterns; Adult; Back pain; Biomechanical Phenomena; Care and treatment; Clinical observation; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Low back pain; Low Back Pain - physiopathology; Male; Middle Aged; Movement; Multi-segment kinematics; Clinical observation; Multi-segment kinematics; Low back pain; Aberrant movement patterns
• ISSN: 1471-2474; 1471-2474
• DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1820-x

Clinical observation of aberrant movement patterns during active forward bending is one criterion used to identify patients with non-specific low back pain suspected to have movement coordination impairment. The purpose of this study was to describe and quantify kinematic patterns of the pelvis and trunk using a dynamics systems approach, and determine agreement between clinical observation and kinematic classification. Ninety-eight subjects performed repeated forward bending with clinical observation and kinematic data simultaneously collected. Kinematic data were plotted using angle-angle, coupling-angle, and phase-plane diagrams. Accuracy statistics in conjunction with receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine agreement between clinical observation and kinematic patterns. Kinematic patterns were consistent with clinical observation and definitions of typical and aberrant movement patterns with moderate agreement (kappa = 0.46-0.50; PABAK = 0.49-0.73). Early pelvic motion dominance in lumbopelvic coupling-angle diagram ≥59° within the first 38% of the movement represent observed altered lumbopelvic rhythm. Frequent disruptions in lumbar spine velocity represented by phase-plane diagrams with local minimum occurrences ≥6 and sudden decoupling in lumbopelvic coupling-angle diagrams with sum of local minimum and maximum occurrences ≥15 represent observed judder. These findings further define observations of movement coordination between the pelvis and lumbar spine for the presence of altered lumbopelvic rhythm and judder. Movement quality of the lumbar spine segment is key to identifying judder. This information will help clinicians better understand and identify aberrant movement patterns in patients with non-specific low back pain.