Harnessing Real-World Evidence to Advance Cancer Research

• Published in: Current oncology (Toronto) Vol. 30; no. 2; pp. 1844 - 1859
• Main Authors: Tang, Monica, Pearson, Sallie-Anne, Simes, Robert J, Chua, Boon H
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01.02.2023; MDPI
• Subjects: Cancer; Care and treatment; Evidence-based medicine; Humans; Information Sources; Medical care; Medical Oncology; Neoplasms; observational study; oncology; Oncology, Experimental; Quality management; randomized controlled trials; real-world evidence; Review; Australia; Canada; real-world evidence; randomized controlled trials; oncology; observational study
• ISSN: 1718-7729; 1198-0052; 1718-7729
• DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020143

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) form a cornerstone of oncology research by generating evidence about the efficacy of therapies in selected patient populations. However, their implementation is often resource- and cost-intensive, and their generalisability to patients treated in routine practice may be limited. Real-world evidence leverages data collected about patients receiving clinical care in routine practice outside of clinical trial settings and provides opportunities to identify and address gaps in clinical trial evidence. This review outlines the strengths and limitations of real-world and RCT evidence and proposes a framework for the complementary use of the two bodies of evidence to advance cancer research. There are challenges to the implementation of real-world research in oncology, including heterogeneity of data sources, timely access to high-quality data, and concerns about the quality of methods leveraging real-world data, particularly causal inference. Improved understanding of the strengths and limitations of real-world data and ongoing efforts to optimise the conduct of real-world evidence research will improve its reliability, understanding and acceptance, and enable the full potential of real-world evidence to be realised in oncology practice.