Sternal instability measured with radiostereometric analysis. A study of method feasibility, accuracy and precision

A small, but unstable, saw-gap may hinder bone-bridging and induce development of painful sternal dehiscence. We propose the use of Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) for evaluation of sternal instability and present a method validation. Four bone analogs (phantoms) were sternotomized and tantalum bea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cardiothoracic surgery Vol. 13; no. 1; p. 41
Main Authors Vestergaard, Rikke Falsig, Søballe, Kjeld, Hasenkam, John Michael, Stilling, Maiken
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 18.05.2018
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A small, but unstable, saw-gap may hinder bone-bridging and induce development of painful sternal dehiscence. We propose the use of Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) for evaluation of sternal instability and present a method validation. Four bone analogs (phantoms) were sternotomized and tantalum beads were inserted in each half. The models were reunited with wire cerclage and placed in a radiolucent separation device. Stereoradiographs (n = 48) of the phantoms in 3 positions were recorded at 4 imposed separation points. The accuracy and precision was compared statistically and presented as translations along the 3 orthogonal axes. 7 sternotomized patients were evaluated for clinical RSA precision by double-examination stereoradiographs (n = 28). In the phantom study, we found no systematic error (p > 0.3) between the three phantom positions, and precision for evaluation of sternal separation was 0.02 mm. Phantom accuracy was mean 0.13 mm (SD 0.25). In the clinical study, we found a detection limit of 0.42 mm for sternal separation and of 2 mm for anterior-posterior dislocation of the sternal halves for the individual patient. RSA is a precise and low-dose image modality feasible for clinical evaluation of sternal stability in research. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02738437 , retrospectively registered.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1749-8090
1749-8090
DOI:10.1186/s13019-018-0735-4