Psychological Distress, Coping Strategies, and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients Under Neoadjuvant Therapy: Protocol of a Systematic Review

• Published in: Cancer control Vol. 29; p. 10732748221074735
• Main Authors: Omari, Majid, Zarrouq, Btissame, Amaadour, Lamiae, Benbrahim, Zineb, El Asri, Achraf, Mellas, Nawfel, El Rhazi, Karima, Ragala, Mohammed El Amine, Halim, Karima
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.01.2022; Sage Publications Ltd; SAGE Publishing
• Subjects: Adaptation, Psychological; Breast cancer; Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy; Cancer therapies; Female; Humans; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Psychological Distress; Quality control; Quality of life; Quality of Life - psychology; Research Design; Study Protocol; Systematic review; Systematic Reviews as Topic; anxiety; psychological; adaptation; Breast neoplasms; depression; quality of life; neoadjuvant therapy; psychological distress
• ISSN: 1073-2748; 1526-2359
• DOI: 10.1177/10732748221074735

Introduction Women with breast cancer eligible for neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) present a disorder of biopsychosocial variables and alteration of their quality of life. They cope with this changing by adopting psychological adjustment strategies, either passive or active. This systematic review aims to investigate the psychological distress, coping strategies, and quality of life in breast cancer patients under neoadjuvant therapy. Methods Cochrane Library, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and Wiley Online library represent the databases that were searched to identify relevant published articles until September 27, 2021. Full-text published articles, written in English and assessing the main outcomes (namely: psychological distress, coping strategies, and quality of life) in women with breast cancer under NAT will be included. Also, we will integrate papers dealing with the related bio psychosocial variables to the main variables. The paper selection, data extraction, and quality assessment of selected studies will be performed independently by two researchers, and disagreements will be resolved through discussions. We will bring together the results of all of the included studies to draw conclusions based on the body of evidence. The narrative approach will be adopted to analyze the results and conclusions extracted and we would perform quantitative groupings if we have similar data. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required as the proposed systematic review will not use primary data. The results of this review will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentation(s). PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021230300.