Fracture in clinical studies of tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis

Background: Preclinical data suggest that tofacitinib would protect bone health in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objective: To assess fracture risk in tofacitinib RA clinical trials. Design: Post hoc analysis. Methods: We analyzed pooled data of phase I/II/III and long-term extension stud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTherapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease Vol. 14; p. 1759720X221142346
Main Authors Hansen, Karen E., Mortezavi, Mahta, Nagy, Edward, Wang, Cunshan, Connell, Carol A., Radi, Zaher, Litman, Heather J., Adami, Giovanni, Rossini, Maurizio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.01.2022
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
SAGE Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Preclinical data suggest that tofacitinib would protect bone health in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objective: To assess fracture risk in tofacitinib RA clinical trials. Design: Post hoc analysis. Methods: We analyzed pooled data of phase I/II/III and long-term extension studies (‘P123LTE cohort’), pooled data of placebo-controlled portions of phase III studies (phase III placebo-controlled cohort), and data from ORAL Surveillance [phase IIIb/IV randomized, open-label trial evaluating tofacitinib 5/10 mg twice daily (BID) vs tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) in patients ⩾ 50 years with ⩾ 1 additional cardiovascular risk factor]. Results: In the phase III placebo-controlled cohort, incidence rates (IRs) [95% confidence interval (CI)] of fracture were 2.11 (1.09–3.68), 2.56 (1.23–4.71), and 4.43 (1.78–9.12) per 100 patient-years (PYs) for tofacitinib 5 mg BID, tofacitinib 10 mg BID, and placebo, respectively [tofacitinib 5 mg BID vs placebo: hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) = 0.55(0.18–1.65); tofacitinib 10 mg BID vs placebo: HR (95% CI) = 0.72 (0.26–2.01)]. In P123LTE, IRs (95% CI) were 2.62 (2.29–2.99) and 2.26 (2.02–2.52) per 100 PY for average tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID, respectively. In ORAL Surveillance, IRs (95% CI) were 2.79 (2.34–3.30), 2.87 (2.40–3.40), and 2.27 (1.87–2.74) per 100 PY for tofacitinib 5 mg BID, tofacitinib 10 mg BID, and TNFi, respectively. In ORAL Surveillance, the risk of fracture was numerically higher than TNFi for tofacitinib 5 mg BID [HR (95% CI) = 1.23 (0.96–1.58)] and tofacitinib 10 mg BID [HR (95% CI) = 1.26 (0.97–1.62)]. In ORAL Surveillance, independent predictors of all and osteoporotic fractures with tofacitinib or TNFi included age ⩾ 65, female sex, history of fracture/osteoporosis, and baseline oral corticosteroid use. Conclusion: This post hoc analysis showed numerically lower fracture risk with tofacitinib versus placebo and numerically greater risk versus TNFi. We did not identify any tofacitinib-specific predictors of fractures, and predictors of fracture were generally aligned with prior literature in the general population and patients with RA. Patients with fracture risk factors should be adequately monitored and treated. Clinical trial registration: NCT00960440, NCT00847613, NCT00814307, NCT00856544, NCT00853385, NCT01039688, NCT02187055, NCT02831855, NCT00413699, NCT00147498, NCT00413660, NCT00550446, NCT00603512, NCT00687193, NCT00661661, NCT01164579, NCT00976599, NCT01059864, NCT01359150, NCT01262118, NCT01484561, NCT02281552, NCT02147587, NCT02092467
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1759-720X
1759-7218
DOI:10.1177/1759720X221142346