Source and destination memory: Two sides of the same coin?

• Published in: Memory (Hove) Vol. 23; no. 4; pp. 563 - 576
• Main Authors: Lindner, Isabel, Drouin, Héloïse, Tanguay, Annick F. N., Stamenova, Vessela, Davidson, Patrick S. R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Routledge 19.05.2015
• Subjects: Aged; Ageing; Aging - psychology; Auditory Perception; Destination memory; Episodic memory; Female; Humans; Male; Memory, Episodic; Mental Recall; Reading; Source memory; Young Adult; Destination memory; Source memory; Episodic memory; Ageing
• ISSN: 0965-8211; 1464-0686
• DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2014.911329

Whereas source memory involves remembering from whom you have heard something, destination memory involves remembering to whom you have told something. Despite its practical relevance, destination memory has been studied little. Recently, two reports suggested that generally destination memory should be poorer than source memory, and that it should be particularly difficult for older people. We tested these predictions by having young and older participants read sentences to two examiners (destination encoding) and listen to sentences read by two examiners (source encoding), under intentional (Experiment 1) or incidental encoding (Experiments 2 and 3). Only in Experiment 3 (in which cognitive demands during destination encoding were increased) was destination memory significantly poorer than source memory. In none of the experiments were older adults inferior to the young on destination or source memory. Destination- and source-memory scores were significantly correlated. Item memory was consistently superior for sentences that had been read out loud (during destination encoding) versus those that had been heard (during source encoding). Destination memory needs not always be poorer than source memory, appears not to be particularly impaired by normal ageing and may depend on similar processes to those supporting source memory.