A multisession evaluation of an adaptive competitive arm rehabilitation game

• Published in: Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 128 - 15
• Main Authors: Goršič, Maja, Cikajlo, Imre, Goljar, Nika, Novak, Domen
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 06.12.2017; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analysis; Arm; Arm rehabilitation; Competitive Behavior; Dynamic difficulty adaptation; Exercise Therapy; Female; Games, Experimental; Home Care Services; Humans; Interpersonal rehabilitation games; Interpersonal Relations; Male; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Middle Aged; Motivation; Multiplayer games; Nervous System Diseases - psychology; Nervous System Diseases - rehabilitation; Paresis - rehabilitation; Patient Satisfaction; Personality; Sensors; Social interaction; Stroke Rehabilitation - methods; Stroke Rehabilitation - psychology; Surveys and Questionnaires; Virtual Reality; Young Adult; Dynamic difficulty adaptation; Exercise intensity; Motivation; Interpersonal rehabilitation games; Social interaction; Virtual reality; Multiplayer games; Arm rehabilitation
• ISSN: 1743-0003; 1743-0003
• DOI: 10.1186/s12984-017-0336-9

People with neurological injuries such as stroke should exercise frequently and intensely to regain their motor abilities, but are generally hindered by lack of motivation. One way to increase motivation in rehabilitation is through competitive exercises, but such exercises have only been tested in single brief sessions and usually did not adapt difficulty to the patient's abilities. We designed a competitive arm rehabilitation game for two players that dynamically adapts its difficulty to both players' abilities. This game was evaluated by two participant groups: 15 participants with chronic arm impairment who exercised at home with an unimpaired friend or relative, and 20 participants in the acute or subacute phase of stroke who exercised in pairs (10 pairs) at a rehabilitation clinic. All participants first played the game against their human opponent for 3 sessions, then played alone (against a computer opponent) in the final, fourth session. In all sessions, participants' subjective experiences were assessed with the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory questionnaire while exercise intensity was measured using inertial sensors built into the rehabilitation device. After the fourth session, a final brief questionnaire was used to compare competition and exercising alone. Participants who played against an unimpaired friend or relative at home tended to prefer competition (only 1 preferred exercising alone), and exhibited higher enjoyment and exercise intensity when competing (first three sessions) than when exercising alone (last session). Participants who played against each other in the clinic, however, did not exhibit significant differences between competition and exercising alone. For both groups, there was no difference in enjoyment or exercise intensity between the first three sessions, indicating no negative effects of habituation or novelty. Competitive exercises have high potential for unsupervised home rehabilitation, as they improve enjoyment and exercise intensity compared to exercising alone. Such exercises could thus improve rehabilitation outcome, but this needs to be tested in long-term clinical trials. It is not clear why participants who competed against each other at the clinic did not exhibit any advantages of competition, and further studies are needed to determine how different factors (environment, nature of opponent etc.) influence patients' experiences with competitive exercises. The study is not a clinical trial. While human subjects are involved, they do not participate in a full rehabilitation intervention, and no health outcomes are examined.