Alpha-2 adrenergic challenge with guanfacine one month after mild traumatic brain injury: Altered working memory and BOLD response
Alterations in working memory (WM) are common after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Frontal catecholaminergic systems, including the alpha-2 adrenergic system, modulate WM function and may be affected in TBI. We hypothesized that administration of an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist might improve WM after m...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of psychophysiology Vol. 82; no. 1; pp. 107 - 114 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
01.10.2011
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Alterations in working memory (WM) are common after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Frontal catecholaminergic systems, including the alpha-2 adrenergic system, modulate WM function and may be affected in TBI. We hypothesized that administration of an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist might improve WM after mild TBI (MTBI). Thirteen individuals with MTBI 1
month after injury and 14 healthy controls (HC) were challenged with guanfacine and placebo prior to administration of a verbal WM functional MRI task. Guanfacine was associated with improved WM performance in the MTBI but not the HC group. On guanfacine the MTBI group showed increased activation within a WM task-specific region of interest. Findings are consistent with the hypothesis that alterations in WM after MTBI may be improved with the alpha-2 agonist guanfacine.
► Individuals with MTBI differed from controls in response to guanfacine. ► The MTBI group showed improved working memory (WM) performance on guanfacine. ► Improved WM performance was associated with increased activation of frontal WM cortex. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0167-8760 1872-7697 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.06.022 |