Implementation Science Research in Communication Sciences and Disorders: A Scoping Review

• Published in: American journal of speech-language pathology Vol. 31; no. 3; pp. 1054 - 1083
• Main Authors: Douglas, Natalie F., Feuerstein, Julie L., Oshita, Jennifer Y., Schliep, Megan E., Danowski, Margaret L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 01.05.2022
• Subjects: Aphasia; Clinical medicine; Communication; Communication disorders; Communication Research; Education; Evidence Based Practice; Evidence-based medicine; Forum: Clinicians and Researchers Navigating Implementation Science in CSD; Humans; Implementation Science; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Meta Analysis; Practice research; Researchers; Science; Speech
• ISSN: 1058-0360; 1558-9110; 1558-9110
• DOI: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00126

The purpose of this study was to complete a scoping review of implementation science (IS) research in communication sciences and disorders (CSD) over time and to determine characteristics of IS research in CSD. A scoping review was conducted of PubMed and Education Resources Information Center for sources published in English that (a) included CSD practitioners, (b) addressed IS research, and (c) identified a specific evidence-based practice. Resulting sources were systematically examined for study aim, patient populations, implementation framework utilized, setting of the study, implementation strategy examined, and implementation outcome measured. The majority of the 82 studies that underwent a full-text review (80.5%) were published in 2014 or later. One fourth of the studies were concept papers, and another one fourth focused on context assessment (25.6% of studies, each), 11% focused on designing implementation strategies, and 36.6% focused on testing implementation strategies. The patient population most frequently represented aphasia (21.3%), and most studies (34.4%) were conducted in inpatient medical settings. Nearly half (42.6%) of the nonconcept studies lacked an IS framework. Among implementation strategies identified, approximately one third of studies focused on education and/or training plus another strategy and one fourth focused on education and/or training alone. Implementation outcomes measured typically represented early stages of implementation. This scoping review of IS research in CSD described the landscape of IS studies in CSD. IS is intersecting with CSD at a rapid rate, especially since 2014. Future IS research in CSD should adopt an implementation framework a priori and consider the broad range of implementation strategies and outcomes to support the uptake of research into typical practice settings.