Clinicopathological comparison of the World Health Organization/Wotherspoon score to the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adult grade for the post-treatment evaluation of gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma

Background and Aim:  The World Health Organization (WHO) has adopted criteria for the histological differential diagnosis of gastric extranodal marginal zone B‐cell lymphoma of mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (GML) based on the criteria proposed by Wotherspoon in 1993 (WHO/Wotherspoon score). Thes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology Vol. 24; no. 2; pp. 307 - 315
Main Authors Shiozawa, Eisuke, Norose, Tomoko, Kaneko, Kazuhiro, Yamochi-Onizuka, Toshiko, Takimoto, Masafumi, Imawari, Michio, Ota, Hidekazu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Melbourne, Australia Blackwell Publishing Asia 01.02.2009
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and Aim:  The World Health Organization (WHO) has adopted criteria for the histological differential diagnosis of gastric extranodal marginal zone B‐cell lymphoma of mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (GML) based on the criteria proposed by Wotherspoon in 1993 (WHO/Wotherspoon score). These histological criteria are commonly used by pathologists for initial diagnoses, but have not been adopted uniformly for the post‐treatment evaluation of GML. In 2003, the Groupe d’Etude des Lymphomes de l’Adult (GELA) proposed a new histological grading system (GELA grade) in preference to use of the WHO/Wotherspoon score for post‐treatment evaluation. In the present study, we compared the WHO/Wotherspoon and GELA systems to examine which histological criterion is better for post‐treatment evaluation. Methods:  Fourteen cases of GML under long‐term follow up were initially diagnosed according to the WHO criteria with detailed immunohistology, and were periodically evaluated with both histological criteria after anti‐Helicobacter pylori treatment. They were also evaluated based on histological stromal changes accompanying the disappearance of lymphoma tissue. Results:  The study showed strong similarities between the WHO/Wotherspoon and GELA systems and no clear advantage of either system for post‐treatment evaluation. The GELA grade could not be used for the evaluation of changes in the degree of lymphoma infiltration from pre‐ to post‐treatment because the four‐item scale is not comparable with the formal six‐point WHO/Wotherspoon scale. Stromal changes in the lamina propria, including an empty appearance and fibrosis, were correlated with lymphoma reduction after treatment and appear to be good indicators for post‐treatment evaluation. Conclusion:  We propose the utilization of the WHO/Wotherspoon score accompanied by the assessment of stromal changes for the post‐treatment evaluation of GML.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JGH5639
istex:ECF7511D960134F7768C76CEC93D8AD1D7BA971D
ark:/67375/WNG-6G2C5ZG9-M
2007
24
2001
8
382–383).
Part of this work was first reported in
Ann. Surg. Oncol.
162–174. (In Japanese.) The authors make this declaration in compliance with the guidelines of the Consensus Statement on Submission and Publication of Manuscripts
Shindan‐Byori
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0815-9319
1440-1746
DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05639.x