Otolaryngology residency programs' perspectives on virtual interviews during the COVID‐19 pandemic

• Published in: Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology Vol. 7; no. 3; pp. 692 - 698
• Main Authors: Risbud, Adwight, Pang, Jonathan C., Ito, Sun, Tjoa, Tjoson, Armstrong, William B., Abouzari, Mehdi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.06.2022; Wiley
• Subjects: Candidates; Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Internships; medical student; Original Research; otolaryngology match; residency program; virtual interview; United States > US; virtual interview; residency program; COVID‐19; medical student; otolaryngology match
• ISSN: 2378-8038; 2378-8038
• DOI: 10.1002/lio2.681

Objective To evaluate perceptions of otolaryngology residency program directors (PDs) and department chairs (DCs) on virtual interviews (VIs) at the conclusion of the 2021 residency match. Study design Cross‐sectional survey study. Methods An anonymous and voluntary survey was administered to PDs and DCs of U.S. otolaryngology residency programs from March 1, 2021 to April 11, 2021. Utilizing Likert scale ratings, the survey measured overall satisfaction with the VI format, perceived ability to assess key candidate attributes, relative importance of traditional candidate metrics, and likelihood to implement VIs in future cycles. Results Ninety‐four surveys were completed by PDs (48.9%) and DCs (51.1%). Sixty (63.8%) respondents found the VI experience to be satisfactory or strongly satisfactory. Sixty‐six (70.2%) respondents felt confident in their ability to assess a candidate's professionalism and communication skills through VIs; however, confidence in gauging an applicant's clinical skills/knowledge (41.2%) and overall program fit (47.3%) was lower. Regarding candidate metrics, 64 (68.1%) respondents believed that personal prior knowledge of the applicant gained increased importance with VIs. Forty‐four (46.8%) and 45 (47.9%) participants believed that letters of recommendation in the specialty and perceived commitment to their program similarly attained increased significance in evaluating applicants, respectively. Conclusion Most PDs and DCs were satisfied with their VI experiences and expect the quality of interns to be unaffected by virtual assessment modalities. Majority opinion on the relative importance of traditional applicant metrics remained largely unchanged, the exception being an increase in importance of prior knowledge of the applicant. Level of Evidence: N/A.