Study on double-layer protuberant gas foil journal bearings with different foil layers arrangement

With the excellent damping performance, gas foil bearing (GFB) is becoming the promising hydrodynamic lubrication structure for high speed turbomachinery. To improve the performance of the conventional GFBs, a new double-layer gas foil bearing (PGFB) with double-layer protuberant strip as elastic su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing Vol. 9; no. 2; p. JAMDSM0014
Main Authors CHEN, Shuangtao, HOU, Yu, NIU, Lu, YANG, Shanju, LAI, Tianwei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers 01.01.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:With the excellent damping performance, gas foil bearing (GFB) is becoming the promising hydrodynamic lubrication structure for high speed turbomachinery. To improve the performance of the conventional GFBs, a new double-layer gas foil bearing (PGFB) with double-layer protuberant strip as elastic support is developed. A 2D numerical model based on Reynolds equation and Kirchhoff equation is established to determine the gas film thickness, gas film pressure and foil deflection. Static performance and dynamic performance of three PGFBs with different elastic foil layers arrangement are presented and compared qualitative dues to the difficulties in measuring the practice eccentricity and load capacity with high speed rotor-bearing system. By applying in a turboexpander with ϕ25mm rotor diameter, the three PGFBs are tested. Because the three PGFBs share the same rotor structure and the same air supply pressure, the rotor drag torque and the bearing static load are almost the same in the tests. The experimental results show that all the PGFBs run well in turboexpander. Rotating speed, temperature and enthalpy differences and rotor synchronous vibration under the same turboexpander air supply pressure are compared. The numerical model predicted well the qualitative difference of the loading performance of the three PGFBs.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1881-3054
1881-3054
DOI:10.1299/jamdsm.2015jamdsm0014