Comparison of laser Doppler flowmetry and thermometry in the postoperative monitoring of replantations

Reliable postoperative monitoring in microvascular surgery is necessary to improve the success rate of reexplorations following vascular compromise. Surface thermometry is known as an easy and inexpensive objective postoperative monitor and therefore is used by many microsurgeons. Reliability, howev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of hand surgery (American ed.) Vol. 20; no. 1; p. 88
Main Authors Hovius, S E, van Adrichem, L N, Mulder, H D, van Strik, R, van der Meulen, J C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.01.1995
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Reliable postoperative monitoring in microvascular surgery is necessary to improve the success rate of reexplorations following vascular compromise. Surface thermometry is known as an easy and inexpensive objective postoperative monitor and therefore is used by many microsurgeons. Reliability, however, is not satisfactory, and therefore several other instrumental methods have been tested of which laser Doppler flowmetry shows the most promising results. This study compared laser Doppler flowmetry to thermometry in the postoperative monitoring after replantation surgery. In 34 patients, 45 replantations and revascularizations were monitored by laser Doppler flowmetry and thermometry. A reliable alarm value of 10 PU was defined for replantations and revascularizations, with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 94%. Thermometry showed a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 86% at 29 degrees C.
ISSN:0363-5023
DOI:10.1016/s0363-5023(05)80065-6