Earnings-based and accrual-based market anomalies: one effect or two?
This paper investigates whether the accrual pricing anomaly documented by Sloan (1996. The Accounting Review 71(3), 289–316) for annual data holds for quarterly data and whether this form of market mispricing is distinct from the post-earnings announcement drift anomaly. We find that the market appe...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of accounting & economics Vol. 29; no. 1; pp. 101 - 123 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
01.02.2000
Elsevier Elsevier Sequoia S.A |
Series | Journal of Accounting and Economics |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This paper investigates whether the accrual pricing anomaly documented by Sloan (1996. The Accounting Review 71(3), 289–316) for annual data holds for quarterly data and whether this form of market mispricing is distinct from the post-earnings announcement drift anomaly. We find that the market appears to overestimate the persistence of the accrual component of quarterly earnings and, therefore, tends to overprice accruals. Moreover, the accrual mispricing appears to be distinct from post-earnings announcement drift. A hedge portfolio trading strategy that exploits both forms of market mispricing generates abnormal returns in excess of those based on either unexpected earnings or accruals information alone. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0165-4101 1879-1980 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0165-4101(00)00015-X |