Combined Focused Next-Generation Sequencing Assays to Guide Precision Oncology in Solid Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis from an Institutional Molecular Tumor Board

Background: Increasing knowledge of cancer biology and an expanding spectrum of molecularly targeted therapies provide the basis for precision oncology. Despite extensive gene diagnostics, previous reports indicate that less than 10% of patients benefit from this concept. Methods: We retrospectively...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancers Vol. 14; no. 18; p. 4430
Main Authors Tarawneh, Thomas S., Rodepeter, Fiona R., Teply-Szymanski, Julia, Ross, Petra, Koch, Vera, Thölken, Clemens, Schäfer, Jonas A., Gremke, Niklas, Mack, Hildegard I. D., Gold, Judith, Riera-Knorrenschild, Jorge, Wilhelm, Christian, Rinke, Anja, Middeke, Martin, Klemmer, Andreas, Romey, Marcel, Hattesohl, Akira, Jesinghaus, Moritz, Görg, Christian, Figiel, Jens, Chung, Ho-Ryun, Wündisch, Thomas, Neubauer, Andreas, Denkert, Carsten, Mack, Elisabeth K. M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 01.09.2022
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Increasing knowledge of cancer biology and an expanding spectrum of molecularly targeted therapies provide the basis for precision oncology. Despite extensive gene diagnostics, previous reports indicate that less than 10% of patients benefit from this concept. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients referred to our center’s Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) from 2018 to 2021. Molecular testing by next-generation sequencing (NGS) included a 67-gene panel for the detection of short-sequence variants and copy-number alterations, a 53- or 137-gene fusion panel and an ultra-low-coverage whole-genome sequencing for the detection of additional copy-number alterations outside the panel’s target regions. Immunohistochemistry for microsatellite instability and PD-L1 expression complemented NGS. Results: A total of 109 patients were referred to the MTB. In all, 78 patients received therapeutic proposals (70 based on NGS) and 33 were treated accordingly. Evaluable patients treated with MTB-recommended therapy (n = 30) had significantly longer progression-free survival than patients treated with other therapies (n = 17) (4.3 vs. 1.9 months, p = 0.0094). Seven patients treated with off-label regimens experienced major clinical benefits. Conclusion: The combined focused sequencing assays detected targetable alterations in the majority of patients. Patient benefits appeared to lie in the same range as with large-scale sequencing approaches.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2072-6694
2072-6694
DOI:10.3390/cancers14184430