Using the SF‐36 with older adults: a cross‐sectional community‐based survey
Objectives: to assess the practicality and validity of using the 36‐item short‐form health survey (SF‐36) in a community‐dwelling population over 65, and to obtain population scores in this age group. Design: postal survey, using a questionnaire booklet containing the SF‐36 and other health‐related...
Saved in:
Published in | Age and ageing Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. 337 - 343 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Oxford University Press
01.07.2001
Oxford Publishing Limited (England) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0002-0729 1468-2834 1468-2834 |
DOI | 10.1093/ageing/30.4.337 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objectives: to assess the practicality and validity of using the 36‐item short‐form health survey (SF‐36) in a community‐dwelling population over 65, and to obtain population scores in this age group. Design: postal survey, using a questionnaire booklet containing the SF‐36 and other health‐related items, of all those aged 65 or over registered with 12 general practices in Sheffield. Non‐respondents received up to two reminders at 3‐weekly intervals. Sample: 9897 subjects, aged 65–104 years. Main outcome measures: scores for the eight dimensions of the SF‐36 and a modified version of the physical functioning dimension. Results: the SF‐36 achieved a response rate of 82% (n=8117) and dimension completion rates of 86.4–97.7%. Internal consistency measured by Cronbach's α exceeded 0.80 for all dimensions except social functioning. These results compare favourably with postal surveys of younger adults. We calculated scores for older adults by age and sex. Comparison with data from younger people showed how physical health declines steeply with age, in marked contrast to mental health. Conclusions: the SF‐36 is a practical and valid instrument for use in postal surveys of older people living at home. The population scores provided here may facilitate its use in future surveys of older adults. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | local:300337 ark:/67375/HXZ-Q58SWGBJ-K istex:8A88F580FD8E62B5F595047BE43410790BEA8AAC PII:0002-0729 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 |
ISSN: | 0002-0729 1468-2834 1468-2834 |
DOI: | 10.1093/ageing/30.4.337 |