Frequency of Von Hippel-Lindau germline mutations in classic and non-classic Von Hippel-Lindau disease identified by DNA sequencing, Southern blot analysis and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification
The current clinical diagnosis of Von Hippel‐Lindau (VHL) disease demands at least one specific a sporadic VHL manifestation in a patient with familial VHL disease, or, in asporadic patient, at least two or more hemangioblastomas or a single hemangioblastoma in combination with a typical visceral le...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical genetics Vol. 72; no. 2; pp. 122 - 129 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.08.2007
Blackwell |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The current clinical diagnosis of Von Hippel‐Lindau (VHL) disease demands at least one specific a sporadic VHL manifestation in a patient with familial VHL disease, or, in asporadic patient, at least two or more hemangioblastomas or a single hemangioblastoma in combination with a typical visceral lesion. To evaluate this definition, we studied the frequency of germline VHL mutation in three patients groups: (i) multi‐organ involvement (classic VHL), (ii) limited VHL manifestations meeting criteria (non‐classic VHL) and (iii) patients with VHL‐associated tumors not meeting current diagnostic VHL criteria. In addition, we validated multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification (MLPA) as a rapid and reliable quantitative method for the identification of germline VHL deletions. The frequency of germline VHL mutations was very high in classic VHL cases with multi‐organ involvement (95%), lower in non‐classic cases that meet current diagnostic criteria but have limited VHL manifestations or single‐organ involvement (24%) and low (3.3%), but tangible in cases not meeting current diagnostic VHL criteria. The detection of germline VHL mutations in patients or families with limited VHL manifestations, or single‐organ involvement is relevant for follow‐up of probands and early identification of at‐risk relatives. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-Z3BGP092-5 istex:4BA08A62A92C8443583685C375F3D269CF6B75E9 ArticleID:CGE827 Current address: PL Pearson, Department of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil Both authors contributed equally to this work. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0009-9163 1399-0004 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00827.x |