Is size‐assortative mating important for rapid pigment differentiation in a freshwater isopod?

• Published in: Journal of evolutionary biology Vol. 19; no. 6; pp. 1911 - 1919
• Main Authors: HARGEBY, A., ERLANDSSON, J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2006
• Subjects: adaptive change; adaptive pigmentation; AMPHIPOD; Animal behavior; Animal reproduction; Animals; Asellus aquaticus; ASELLUS-AQUATICUS L; Biologi; Biological Sciences; BODY-SIZE; Chara; Earth and Related Environmental Sciences; ecological divergence; Ecology; Ekologi; Environment; Environmental Sciences; EVOLUTION; Female; FISH PREDATION; Freshwater; Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap; indirect selection; Invertebrates; Isopoda; Isopoda - physiology; LITTORINA-SAXATILIS; local; local adaptive change; Male; Miljövetenskap; Natural Sciences; NATURAL-SELECTION; Naturvetenskap; Pigmentation - physiology; Pigments; POPULATIONS; reproductive isolation; Sexual Behavior, Animal; SEXUAL ISOLATION; sexual selection; Size; size-assortative mating; SPECIATION
• ISSN: 1010-061X; 1420-9101; 1420-9101
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01170.x

Identifying mechanisms behind assortative mating is central to the understanding of ecological divergence and speciation. Recent studies show that populations of the freshwater isopod Asellus aquaticus can rapidly become locally differentiated when submerged Chara vegetation expands in lakes. In the novel Chara habitat, isopods have become lighter pigmented and smaller than in ancestral reed stands. In this study, we used a laboratory multiple‐choice experiment to investigate assortative mating as a possible prezygotic reproductive barrier between Chara and reed isopods. Mating was assortative when Chara isopods were experimentally mixed with isopods from an adjacent reed site with large‐size individuals, suggesting a partial prezygotic reproductive barrier. No deviation from random mating could, however, be detected when Chara isopods were mixed with smaller sized isopods from another reed site. In both experiments, assortative mating was apparently based on size, as Chara isopods were larger and reed isopods smaller in mixed pairs than in assortative pairs. Pigmentation did not have any clear influence on mating. We suggest that divergence in pigmentation evolved through natural selection in conjunction with size‐assortative mating indirectly causing assortative mating between Chara and reed isopods. Size‐assortative mating is likely a by‐product of natural selection, but its importance may hypothetically be transient, if selection erodes the correlation between pigmentation and size over time.