Evaluation of 316 narrow diameter implants followed for 5-10 years: a clinical and radiographic retrospective study

Objectives: Narrow diameter implants (NDIs; diameter >3.75 mm) are useful in replacement of missing incisor teeth and when the bucco‐lingual width of the edentulous crest is insufficient. The present study evaluated the success and survival rates, peri‐implant parameters, mechanical and prostheti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical oral implants research Vol. 21; no. 3; pp. 296 - 307
Main Authors Ar[iota]san, Volkan, Boeluekbas[iota], Niluefer, Ersanl[iota], Selim, Oezdemir, Tayfun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2010
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives: Narrow diameter implants (NDIs; diameter >3.75 mm) are useful in replacement of missing incisor teeth and when the bucco‐lingual width of the edentulous crest is insufficient. The present study evaluated the success and survival rates, peri‐implant parameters, mechanical and prosthetic post‐loading complications of NDIs followed over a 10‐year period. Material and methods: Three hundred and sixteen NDIs were inserted into 139 patients and restored with 120 prostheses. Clinical and radiographic assessment data were collected during recall visits. Implant success (SC), cumulative survival rate (CSR), marginal bone loss (MBL), peri‐implant conditions and prosthetic complications were assessed. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, Kaplan–Meier survival curves with the log‐rank test and life table analysis were used to evaluate the outcome of NDIs within comparable subgroups. MBL and peri‐implant parameters measured annually were further analyzed. Results: The mean follow‐up time was 9.1 years (range: 60–124 months). Twelve implants were lost in the healing phase and two during function. The mean MBL in the maxilla and the mandible was 1.32 ± 0.13 and 1.28 ± 0.3 mm, respectively, after 10 years. SC and CSR were 91.4% and 92.3%, respectively, after 124 months. Smoking and posterior localization were associated with an increased risk of failure. Cement loosening (16.8%) was the most common prosthetic complication. No implants were fractured. Conclusions: NDIs can be used with confidence where a regular diameter implant is not suitable. MBL around NDIs occurred predominantly within 2 years of loading and was minimal thereafter. Further studies are required to clarify the possible risks associated with smoking and posterior placement. To cite this article: 
Arιsan V, Bolukbasι N, Ersanlι S, Ozdemir T. Evaluation of 316 narrow diameter implants followed for 5–10 years: a clinical and radiographic retrospective study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 296–307.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01840.x
Bibliography:istex:7518E65BBFE2BCE13764CF841103C710A3C3F053
ark:/67375/WNG-Z5HB1H76-J
ArticleID:CLR1840
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0905-7161
1600-0501
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01840.x