Hostility and anger in: Cardiovascular reactivity and recovery to mental arithmetic stress

• Published in: International journal of psychophysiology Vol. 72; no. 3; pp. 253 - 259
• Main Authors: Vella, Elizabeth J., Friedman, Bruce H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.06.2009; Elsevier
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Anger - physiology; Anger-in; Behavioral psychophysiology; Biological and medical sciences; Blood Pressure - physiology; Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena; Cardiovascular reactivity; Electrocardiography - methods; Evaluation; Female; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Harassment; Heart Rate - physiology; Hostility; Humans; Male; Mathematics; Psychological Tests; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Recovery; Recovery of Function - physiology; Stress, Psychological - physiopathology; Time Factors; Young Adult; Evaluation; Hostility; Anger-in; Harassment; Recovery; Cardiovascular reactivity; Anger; Affect affectivity; Arithmetics; Emotion emotionality; Mental activity; Stress; Reactivity
• ISSN: 0167-8760; 1872-7697
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.01.003

Hostility and anger have been attributed as psychosocial risk factors for coronary heart disease. Heightened cardiovascular reactivity (CVR), and poor recovery, to provocative stressors are thought to hasten this risk. To examine the relationship between hostility and anger inhibition (AI), and the moderating situational influences of harassment and evaluation, in predicting CVR and recovery to mental arithmetic (MA) stress using a multiple regression approach. 48 male undergraduate students engaged in the following 3 minute tasks during recording of the electrocardiogram, impedance cardiography, and blood pressure: baseline, MA, and evaluation. Hostility and AI were assessed with the Cook-Medley Hostility Scale and the Speilberger Anger In subscale, respectively. An interaction between hostility and AI showed high diastolic blood pressure reactivity to the MA task among hostile anger inhibitors. Harassment did not modify this effect. However, harasser evaluation predicted prolonged systolic blood pressure (SBP) responding among men scoring high in AI, and facilitated SBP recovery among those scoring low on AI. The findings highlight the interactive influences of AI and hostility in predicting CVR to stress and underscore the importance of recovery assessments in understanding the potentially pathogenic associations of these constructs.