Perioperative nutrition management for gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed and the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Malnutrition is a substantial problem in patients with gastric cancer, associated with poor treatment tolerance and increased morbidity. It has also been recognized as an independent prognostic fa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) Vol. 93; p. 111492
Main Authors Xu, Rui, Chen, Xiao-Dong, Ding, Zhi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.01.2022
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Gastric cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed and the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Malnutrition is a substantial problem in patients with gastric cancer, associated with poor treatment tolerance and increased morbidity. It has also been recognized as an independent prognostic factor in individuals with cancer. Early detection of malnutrition and effective perioperative nutrition intervention play an important role in the treatment of gastric cancer. Nutrition screening and assessment are the first steps in nutrition management and provide a basis for further nutrition support. Several tools, including the Nutrition Risk Screening-2002 and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment, have been developed for nutrition screening and assessment. Effective nutrition support can significantly improve nutritional and immune status, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, and accelerate recovery. The aim of this review was to focus on preoperative nutrition risk screening and assessment, and perioperative nutrition support, which may serve as a framework of perioperative nutrition management for gastric cancer.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0899-9007
1873-1244
1873-1244
DOI:10.1016/j.nut.2021.111492