Can reading-specific training stimuli improve the effect of perceptual learning on peripheral reading speed?

• Published in: Vision research (Oxford) Vol. 66; pp. 17 - 25
• Main Authors: Bernard, Jean-Baptiste, Arunkumar, Amit, Chung, Susana T.L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.08.2012; Elsevier
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Cognitive science; Computer science; Female; Humans; Learning; Letter recognition; Linguistics; Male; Neuroscience; Perceptual learning; Psychology; Psychophysics; Reading; Recognition, Psychology; Visual Fields - physiology; Visual Perception - physiology; Young Adult; Perceptual learning; Reading; Letter recognition
• ISSN: 0042-6989; 1878-5646; 0042-6989
• DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.06.012

► We examined perceptual learning using a trigram letter recognition task. ► We compared visual-span profiles and reading speed before and after training. ► Training stimuli were reading trigrams, chunks of three letters from common words. ► Size of visual span and reading speed increased following four daily training sessions. ► Improvements were similar whether reading or random trigrams were used for training. In a previous study, Chung, Legge, and Cheung (2004) showed that training using repeated presentation of trigrams (sequences of three random letters) resulted in an increase in the size of the visual span (number of letters recognized in a glance) and reading speed in the normal periphery. In this study, we asked whether we could optimize the benefit of trigram training on reading speed by using trigrams more specific to the reading task (i.e., trigrams frequently used in the English language) and presenting them according to their frequencies of occurrence in normal English usage and observers’ performance. Averaged across seven observers, our training paradigm (4days of training) increased the size of the visual span by 6.44bits, with an accompanied 63.6% increase in the maximum reading speed, compared with the values before training. However, these benefits were not statistically different from those of Chung, Legge, and Cheung (2004) using a random-trigram training paradigm. Our findings confirm the possibility of increasing the size of the visual span and reading speed in the normal periphery with perceptual learning, and suggest that the benefits of training on letter recognition and maximum reading speed may not be linked to the types of letter strings presented during training.