Automated Extraction of Viral-Pathogen RNA and DNA for High-Throughput Quantitative Real-Time PCR

The performance of the m1000 system (Abbott Laboratories, Illinois) as a front-end extraction system for high-throughput "in-house" quantitative real-time PCR assays was analyzed and compared to that of manual extraction of plasma and serum samples (hepatitis C virus [HCV] and hepatitis B...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Clinical Microbiology Vol. 43; no. 11; pp. 5541 - 5546
Main Authors Beuselinck, Kurt, Ranst, Marc van, Eldere, J. van
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC American Society for Microbiology 01.11.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The performance of the m1000 system (Abbott Laboratories, Illinois) as a front-end extraction system for high-throughput "in-house" quantitative real-time PCR assays was analyzed and compared to that of manual extraction of plasma and serum samples (hepatitis C virus [HCV] and hepatitis B virus [HBV]) and EDTA-blood samples (cytomegalovirus [CMV] and Epstein-Barr virus [EBV]). Linearity of extraction was tested on dilution series of HCV and HBV reference materials. The correlation coefficient for standard curves based on repeated extraction runs was 0.97 ± 0.06 for HCV and 0.97 ± 0.03 for HBV, indicating a linear extraction from 100 to 1.0 x 10⁵ HCV IU/ml and from 100 to 1.0 x 10⁶ HBV IU/ml. Intra- and interrun variability was below 0.23 log₁₀ IU/ml for 2.98 to 5.28 log₁₀ HCV IU/ml and 2.70 to 5.20 log₁₀ HBV IU/ml. Correlation between automated and manual extraction was very good. For HCV, the correlation coefficient was 0.91 and the mean difference in viral load was 0.13 log₁₀ HCV IU/ml. For HBV, the correlation coefficient was 0.98 and the mean difference in viral load 0.61 log₁₀ HBV IU/ml. For CMV and EBV, the correlation coefficient was 0.98 and the mean difference in viral load 0.33 log₁₀ copies/ml. Accuracy was confirmed with a reference panel (QCMD, Glasgow, Scotland) for all four assays. No cross-contamination was observed when extracting strongly positive polyomavirus samples (8.10 log₁₀ copies/ml) interspersed with polyomavirus-negative samples. Automated extraction via the m1000 system offers a high reliability of extraction and resulted in a strong reduction of the required extraction hands-on time for high-throughput PCR compared to manual extraction protocols.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of Molecular Diagnostics, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, BE-3000 Leuven, Belgium. Phone: 32-16-347950. Fax: 32-16-347949. E-mail: kurt.beuselinck@uz.kuleuven.ac.be.
ISSN:0095-1137
1098-660X
1098-5530
DOI:10.1128/JCM.43.11.5541-5546.2005