Epidural anesthesia as a novel anesthetic technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion

Abstract Study Objective To determine if epidural anesthesia is a reasonable technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Design Retrospective chart review. Setting Academic university hospital. Measurements The charts of patients who underwent an anterior lumbar interbody fusion between January...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical anesthesia Vol. 23; no. 7; pp. 521 - 526
Main Authors Schroeder, Kristopher M., MD, Zahed, Cameron, MD, Andrei, Adi C., PhD, Han, Seungbong, MS, Ford, Michael P., MD, Zdeblick, Thomas A., MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.11.2011
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Study Objective To determine if epidural anesthesia is a reasonable technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Design Retrospective chart review. Setting Academic university hospital. Measurements The charts of patients who underwent an anterior lumbar interbody fusion between January 1, 2001 and November 1, 2008 were reviewed. A total of 102 consecutive patients, of whom 19 received an epidural and 83 underwent general anesthesia, met inclusion criteria. Postoperative pain, nausea, opioid administration, operating room time, anesthesia time, Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU) time, and total hospital time were compared. Main Results In the PACU, patients receiving epidural anesthesia showed reductions in median immediate [numerical rating scale (NRS) 0 vs 7; P < 0.001] and peak (NRS 4 vs 8; P = 0.001) postoperative pain scores, and postoperative mean arterial pressure (69.7 vs 90.3; P < 0.001). Epidural anesthesia patients also needed significantly less intravenous morphine-equivalent medication both intraoperatively (5 vs 29; P < 0.001) and postoperatively (3.34 vs 10; P = 0.021). Conclusions Epidural anesthesia for anterior lumbar interbody fusion is potentially beneficial compared with general anesthesia, showing improved perioperative pain control.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0952-8180
1873-4529
1873-4529
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.01.008